.body("Body")
        .build(),
    )
    newWebSocket()
    clientListener.assertFailure(
      200,
      "Body",
      ProtocolException::class.java,
      "Expected HTTP 101 response but was '200 OK'",
    )
  }

  @Test
  @Throws(IOException::class)
  fun notFound() {
    webServer.enqueue(
      MockResponse
        .Builder()
        .status("HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found")
        .build(),

        this.response = response;
    }

    /**
     * Represents the status of an API response.
     */
    public enum Status {
        /** Successful response status. */
        OK(0),
        /** Bad request status indicating client error. */
        BAD_REQUEST(1),
        /** System error status indicating server error. */
        SYSTEM_ERROR(2),

s??ik?u&ihsagih?kawi???t&ihc?o&k?yot???wa&koyot?zani??yi&monihci?rak???e&inak?k&aoyot?usa??manokot?noyot??i&a&gusak?kot?sia??eot?h&asairawo?cugo?s&ahoyot?oyim???k&a&mok?zako??ihssi??motay?rogamag??n&an&ikeh?ok??ihssin??o&got?ihsin?jna?rihsnihs?suf?tes??u&bo?raho?s&oyik?takihs??yrihc?zah????ok!.&a&dusay?kadih?mayotom?r&ah&im?usuy??umakan??sot!ihsin??wa&g&atik?odoyin??k&as?o????i&esieg?hco!k??jamu?k&a!sus??usto??ma&gak?k??rahan??o&mukus?n&i?ust!ihsagih???torum?yot!o???u&koknan?zimihsasot????ugamay...

      ensureRoomFor(n);
      /*
       * The following call is not statically checked, since arraycopy accepts plain Object for its
       * parameters. If it were statically checked, the checker would still be OK with it, since
       * we're copying into a `contents` array whose type allows it to contain nulls. Still, it's
       * worth noting that we promise not to put nulls into the array in the first `size` elements.

        if (method.getDeclaringClass().equals(TypeVariableImpl.class)) {
          try {
            method.setAccessible(true);
          } catch (AccessControlException e) {
            // OK: the method is accessible to us anyway. The setAccessible call is only for
            // unusual execution environments where that might not be true.
          }
          builder.put(method.getName(), method);
        }

              <!-- FeatureUtilTest.*ExampleDerivedInterfaceTester, com.google.common.io.*Tester, incidentally FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilderTest.MyAbstractTester (but we don't care either way because it's not meant to run on its own but works OK if it does)... but not NullPointerTesterTest, etc. -->
              <exclude>%regex[.*Tester.class]</exclude>
              <!-- Anonymous TestCase subclasses in GeneratedMonitorTest -->

              <!-- FeatureUtilTest.*ExampleDerivedInterfaceTester, com.google.common.io.*Tester, incidentally FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilderTest.MyAbstractTester (but we don't care either way because it's not meant to run on its own but works OK if it does)... but not NullPointerTesterTest, etc. -->
              <exclude>%regex[.*Tester.class]</exclude>
              <!-- Anonymous TestCase subclasses in GeneratedMonitorTest -->

    /*
     * These methods "should" call checkNotNull. However, I'm wary of accidentally introducing
     * anything that might slow down execution on such a hot path. Given that the methods are only
     * package-private, I feel OK with just not testing them for NPE.
     *
     * Note that testing casValue is particularly dangerous because it uses Unsafe under some

                    if (Constants.TRUE.equalsIgnoreCase(infoMap.get(Constants.CRAWLER_STATUS))) {
                        postcard.setStatus(Constants.OK);
                    } else {
                        postcard.setStatus(Constants.FAIL);
                    }
                    postcard.setJobname(systemProperties.getProperty("job.runtime.name", StringUtil.EMPTY));

  //
  // See: http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/2015-January/013800.html
  // For a (long) discussion about this specific issue and the general futility of life.
  //
  // For the time being we are OK with the problem discussed above since it requires a caller to
  // introduce a very specific kind of data-race. And given the other operations performed by these