- Sort Score
- Num 10 results
- Language All
Results 561 - 570 of 821 for typing (0.08 seconds)
-
api/maven-api-core/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/api/MonotonicClockTest.java
assertTrue( later.minus(initial).toMillis() >= 45, "Elapsed time difference should be at least 45ms (accounting for some timing variance)"); } @Test @DisplayName("MonotonicClock start time should remain constant") void testStartTime() throws InterruptedException { Instant start1 = MonotonicClock.start();
Created: Sun Dec 28 03:35:09 GMT 2025 - Last Modified: Wed Jan 15 06:28:29 GMT 2025 - 5.8K bytes - Click Count (0) -
internal/lsync/lrwmutex_test.go
// fmt.Println("1st read lock released, waiting...") }() go func() { time.Sleep(3 * time.Second) lrwm.RUnlock() // fmt.Println("2nd read lock released, waiting...") }() // fmt.Println("Trying to acquire write lock, waiting...") locked = lrwm.GetLock(ctx, "", "", duration) if locked { // fmt.Println("Write lock acquired, waiting...") time.Sleep(1 * time.Second) lrwm.Unlock() } else {
Created: Sun Dec 28 19:28:13 GMT 2025 - Last Modified: Sun Sep 28 20:59:21 GMT 2025 - 7.8K bytes - Click Count (0) -
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md
<!--- and make sure you have followed https://github.com/minio/minio/tree/release/docs/debugging to capture relevant logs --> 1. 2. 3. 4. ## Context <!--- How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish? --> <!--- Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world --> ## Regression <!-- Is this issue a regression? (Yes / No) -->
Created: Sun Dec 28 19:28:13 GMT 2025 - Last Modified: Wed Oct 15 17:29:55 GMT 2025 - 2.1K bytes - Click Count (0) -
docs/de/docs/alternatives.md
Da die Parameter mit TypeScript-Typen beschrieben werden (ähnlich den Python-Typhinweisen), ist die Editorunterstützung ziemlich gut.
Created: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 GMT 2025 - Last Modified: Sat Oct 11 17:48:49 GMT 2025 - 27.4K bytes - Click Count (0) -
docs/en/docs/advanced/events.md
Created: Sun Dec 28 07:19:09 GMT 2025 - Last Modified: Wed Dec 17 20:41:43 GMT 2025 - 7.9K bytes - Click Count (0) -
internal/dsync/drwmutex_test.go
}() go func() { time.Sleep(3 * testDrwMutexAcquireTimeout) drwm2.RUnlock(t.Context()) // fmt.Println("2nd read lock released, waiting...") }() drwm3 := NewDRWMutex(ds, "simplelock") // fmt.Println("Trying to acquire write lock, waiting...") ctx3, cancel3 := context.WithCancel(t.Context()) locked = drwm3.GetLock(ctx3, cancel3, id, source, Options{Timeout: duration}) if locked { // fmt.Println("Write lock acquired, waiting...")
Created: Sun Dec 28 19:28:13 GMT 2025 - Last Modified: Sun Sep 28 20:59:21 GMT 2025 - 9.4K bytes - Click Count (0) -
guava-testlib/src/com/google/common/collect/testing/AbstractIteratorTester.java
*/ protected abstract Iterable<? extends Stimulus<E, ? super I>> getStimulusValues(); /** * Returns a new target iterator each time it's called. This is the iterator you are trying to * test. This must return an Iterator that returns the expected elements passed to the constructor * in the given order. Warning: it is not enough to simply pull multiple iterators from the same
Created: Fri Dec 26 12:43:10 GMT 2025 - Last Modified: Wed May 14 19:40:47 GMT 2025 - 21.4K bytes - Click Count (0) -
android/guava/src/com/google/common/base/NullnessCasts.java
* (And even if annotations on local variables were permitted as an optional hint, no annotation * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying * to get rid of, and {@code @NonNull} would be wrong for our use case for the same reason as * {@code requireNonNull}: Our use case is the one in which {@code T} has parametric nullness—andCreated: Fri Dec 26 12:43:10 GMT 2025 - Last Modified: Wed Aug 13 20:49:47 GMT 2025 - 3.3K bytes - Click Count (0) -
guava/src/com/google/common/base/NullnessCasts.java
* (And even if annotations on local variables were permitted as an optional hint, no annotation * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying * to get rid of, and {@code @NonNull} would be wrong for our use case for the same reason as * {@code requireNonNull}: Our use case is the one in which {@code T} has parametric nullness—andCreated: Fri Dec 26 12:43:10 GMT 2025 - Last Modified: Wed Aug 13 20:49:47 GMT 2025 - 3.3K bytes - Click Count (0) -
src/main/java/jcifs/ntlmssp/Type3Message.java
* @param user * The username for the authenticating user. * @param workstation * The workstation from which authentication is * taking place. * @param flags the flags to use for the Type-3 message * @throws GeneralSecurityException if a cryptographic error occurs * @throws CIFSException if a CIFS protocol error occurs */Created: Sat Dec 20 13:44:44 GMT 2025 - Last Modified: Sat Aug 16 01:32:48 GMT 2025 - 32.7K bytes - Click Count (0)