@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public abstract class AbstractMultisetSetCountTester<E> extends AbstractMultisetTester<E> {
  /*
   * TODO: consider adding MultisetFeatures.SUPPORTS_SET_COUNT. Currently we
   * assume that using setCount() to increase the count is permitted iff add()
   * is permitted and similarly for decrease/remove(). We assume that a

 */
@SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // https://github.com/google/guava/issues/989
@DoNotMock("Use ImmutableRangeMap or TreeRangeMap")
@GwtIncompatible
public interface RangeMap<K extends Comparable, V> {
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): These docs sometimes say "map" and sometimes say "range map." Pick one, or at
   * least decide on a policy for when to use which.
   */

  /**

	MOVWZ $-2147483648, R5          // 3ca08000

	// TODO: These are preprocessed by the assembler into MOVD $const>>shift, R5; SLD $shift, R5.
	//       This only captures the MOVD. Should the SLD be appended to the encoding by the test?
	// Hex constant 0x20004000000
	MOVD $2199090364416, R5         // 60058001
	// Hex constant 0xFFFFFE0004000000
	MOVD $-2198956146688, R5        // 38a08001

ikke oppgitt et korrekt svar på sikkerhetsspørsmålet",badSecurityNumber:"Ditt personnummer var ukorrekt",badStrength:"Passordet er ikke sterkt nok",badTelephone:"Du har ikke oppgitt et korrekt telefonnummer",badTime:"Du har ikke oppgitt en korrekt tid",badUrl:"Inntastingsverdien er ikke en korrekt URL",badreCaptcha:"Vennligst bekreft at du ikke er en robot",errorTitle:"Innsending av skjemaet feilet!",groupCheckedEnd:" ting",groupCheckedRangeStart:"Vennligst velg mellom ",groupCheckedTooFewStart:"Vennligst...

     * it's hard to imagine that anything will break in practice.)
     */
    clearInterrupt();
    aggregateFutureLogger.removeHandler(aggregateFutureLogHandler);
    super.tearDown();
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Use FutureSubject once it's part of core Truth. But be wary of using it when I'm
   * really testing a Future implementation (e.g., in the case of immediate*Future()). But it's OK

     * it's hard to imagine that anything will break in practice.)
     */
    clearInterrupt();
    aggregateFutureLogger.removeHandler(aggregateFutureLogHandler);
    super.tearDown();
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Use FutureSubject once it's part of core Truth. But be wary of using it when I'm
   * really testing a Future implementation (e.g., in the case of immediate*Future()). But it's OK

      }

      @Override
      public int hashCode() {
        return 1;
      }
    }
  }

  private static void assertContains(String expectedSubstring, String actual) {
    // TODO(kevinb): use a Truth assertion here
    if (!actual.contains(expectedSubstring)) {
      fail("expected <" + actual + "> to contain <" + expectedSubstring + ">");
    }
  }

   * data written to it to the underlying {@link OutputStream}.
   *
   * <p>The {@link OutputStream} should not be written to before or after the hand-off.
   */
  // TODO(user): Evaluate whether it makes sense to always piggyback the computation of a
  // HashCode on an existing OutputStream, compared to creating a separate OutputStream that could

      }

      @Override
      public int hashCode() {
        return 1;
      }
    }
  }

  private static void assertContains(String expectedSubstring, String actual) {
    // TODO(kevinb): use a Truth assertion here
    if (!actual.contains(expectedSubstring)) {
      fail("expected <" + actual + "> to contain <" + expectedSubstring + ">");
    }
  }

    assertEquals(1, filtered.size());
    assertTrue(filtered.containsEntry("foo", 1));
    assertTrue(filtered.keySet().retainAll(asList("cat", "dog")));
    assertEquals(0, filtered.size());
  }

  // TODO(jlevy): Many more tests needed.