return err
	}
	b := readBuf(buf[:12])
	if b.uint32() != f.CRC32 {
		return ErrChecksum
	}

	// The two sizes that follow here can be either 32 bits or 64 bits
	// but the spec is not very clear on this and different
	// interpretations has been made causing incompatibilities. We
	// already have the sizes from the central directory so we can
	// just ignore these.

	return nil
}

## 結論 { #conclusion }

讓我們再次回顧之前的句子：

> 現代版本的 Python 支持使用 **"協程"** 的 **`async` 和 `await`** 語法來寫 **"非同步程式碼"**。

現在應該能明白其含意了。✨

這些就是驅動 FastAPI（透過 Starlette）運作的原理，也讓它擁有如此驚人的效能。

## 非常技術性的細節 { #very-technical-details }

/// warning

你大概可以跳過這段。

這裡是有關 FastAPI 內部技術細節。

如果你有相當多的技術背景（例如協程、執行緒、阻塞等），並且對 FastAPI 如何處理 `async def` 與常規 `def` 感到好奇，請繼續閱讀。

///

## 结论 { #conclusion }

让我们再来回顾下上文所说的：

> Python 的现代版本可以通过使用 `async` 和 `await` 语法创建**协程**，并用于支持**异步代码**。

现在应该能明白其含义了。✨

所有这些使得 FastAPI（通过 Starlette）如此强大，也是它拥有如此令人印象深刻的性能的原因。

## 非常技术性的细节 { #very-technical-details }

/// warning | 警告

你可以跳过这里。

这些都是 FastAPI 如何在内部工作的技术细节。

如果你有相当多的技术知识（协程、线程、阻塞等），并且对 FastAPI 如何处理 `async def` 与常规 `def` 感到好奇，请继续。

///

     * handling not just {@code Iterable<S>} instances, but also any {@code
     * Iterable<? extends S>}. However, the need for this comes up so rarely
     * that it doesn't justify making everyone else deal with the very ugly
     * wildcard.
     */
    return new LexicographicalOrdering<S>(this);
  }

  // Regular instance methods

  @Override

	VSLH V1, V2, V3                 // 10611144
	VSLW V1, V2, V3                 // 10611184
	VSL V1, V2, V3                  // 106111c4
	VSLO V1, V2, V3                 // 1061140c
	VSRB V1, V2, V3                 // 10611204
	VSRH V1, V2, V3                 // 10611244
	VSRW V1, V2, V3                 // 10611284
	VSRD V1, V2, V3                 // 106116c4
	VSR V1, V2, V3                  // 106112c4

   *       simply switch over to use the JDK implementation wholesale if probable hash flooding is
   *       detected, sacrificing the compactness guarantee in very rare cases in exchange for much
   *       more reliable worst-case behavior.
   *   <li>null, if no entries have yet been added to the map
   * </ul>
   */
  private transient @Nullable Object table;

  /**

    }

    assertMoreInvariants(map);
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("CollectionIncompatibleType")
  private void assertEntrySetNotContainsString(Set<Entry<K, V>> entrySet) {
    // Very unlikely that a buggy collection would ever return true. It might accidentally throw.
    assertFalse(entrySet.contains("foo"));
  }

  /**

Das sollte jetzt mehr Sinn ergeben. ✨

All das ist es, was FastAPI (via Starlette) befeuert und es eine so beeindruckende Performanz haben lässt.

## Sehr technische Details { #very-technical-details }

/// warning | Achtung

Das folgende können Sie wahrscheinlich überspringen.

Dies sind sehr technische Details darüber, wie **FastAPI** unter der Haube funktioniert.

     * handling not just {@code Iterable<S>} instances, but also any {@code
     * Iterable<? extends S>}. However, the need for this comes up so rarely
     * that it doesn't justify making everyone else deal with the very ugly
     * wildcard.
     */
    return new LexicographicalOrdering<S>(this);
  }

  // Regular instance methods

  @Override

   *
   * <p>If {@link #interruptTask} is also run during completion, {@link #afterDone} runs after it.
   *
   * <p>The default implementation of this method in {@code AbstractFuture} does nothing. This is
   * intended for very lightweight cleanup work, for example, timing statistics or clearing fields.
   * If your task does anything heavier consider, just using a listener with an executor.
   *
   * @since 20.0
   */
  @ForOverride