labels: [ "a:regression", "to-triage" ]
assignees: [ ]
body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: |
        Please use our bug report template to report problems with something that has never worked.
        Regressions reports are greatly appreciated during our RC phase and before a final release.
  - type: textarea
    id: current-behavior
    attributes:
      label: Current Behavior

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

    }

    @Override
    public <T> T lookup(Class<T> type) {
        return objects.stream()
                .filter(type::isInstance)
                .map(type::cast)
                .findAny()
                .orElseThrow(() -> new LookupException("No service of type " + type));
    }

    @Override
    public <T> T lookup(Class<T> type, String name) {
        return null;
    }

    @Override

labels: ["Proposal", "LanguageChange", "LanguageChangeReview"]
title: "proposal: spec: proposal title"


body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: |
       ## Our process for evaluating language changes can be found [here](https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/refs/heads/master#language-changes)

  - type: dropdown
    id: author-go-experience
    attributes:
      label: "Go Programming Experience"

	"database/sql"
	"database/sql/driver"
	"go/ast"
	"reflect"
)

// Expression expression interface
type Expression interface {
	Build(builder Builder)
}

// NegationExpressionBuilder negation expression builder
type NegationExpressionBuilder interface {
	NegationBuild(builder Builder)
}

// Expr raw expression
type Expr struct {
	SQL                string
	Vars               []interface{}
	WithoutParentheses bool
}