long signifFloor = twiceSignifFloor >> 1;
    signifFloor &= SIGNIFICAND_MASK; // remove the implied bit

    /*
     * We round up if either the fractional part of signif is strictly greater than 0.5 (which is
     * true if the 0.5 bit is set and any lower bit is set), or if the fractional part of signif is
     * >= 0.5 and signifFloor is odd (which is true if both the 0.5 bit and the 1 bit are set).
     */

        logger.debug(indent + artifact + " (not setting artifactScope to: " + ignoredScope + "; local artifactScope "
                + artifact.getScope() + " wins)");

        // TODO better way than static? this might hide messages in a reactor
        if (!ignoredArtifacts.contains(artifact)) {
            logger.warn("\n\tArtifact " + artifact + " retains local artifactScope '" + artifact.getScope()

			trimLen:  2,
			expected: []int{1, 2, 3},
		},
		{
			name:     "Trim entire slice",
			input:    []int{1, 2, 3},
			trimLen:  3,
			expected: []int{},
		},
		{
			name:     "Trim length greater than slice length",
			input:    []int{1, 2, 3},
			trimLen:  5,
			expected: []int{},
		},
		{
			name:     "Zero trim length",
			input:    []int{1, 2, 3},
			trimLen:  0,
			expected: []int{1, 2, 3},

    this.remainingField = remainingFutures;
  }

  final Set<Throwable> getOrInitSeenExceptions() {
    /*
     * The initialization of seenExceptionsField has to be more complicated than we'd like. The
     * simple approach would be for each caller CAS it from null to a Set populated with its
     * exception. But there's another race: If the first thread fails with an exception and a second

   * from the resulting text.
   *
   * <p>If the character does not need to be escaped, this method should return {@code null}, rather
   * than a one-character array containing the character itself. This enables the escaping algorithm
   * to perform more efficiently.
   *
   * <p>An escaper is expected to be able to deal with any {@code char} value, so this method should

   * uniform, the actual concurrency observed may vary. Ideally, you should choose a value to
   * accommodate as many threads as will ever concurrently modify the table. Using a significantly
   * higher value than you need can waste space and time, and a significantly lower value can lead
   * to thread contention. But overestimates and underestimates within an order of magnitude do not

            // Simulate partial copy where not all requested bytes were copied
            byte[] buffer = createValidCopyChunkResponse(3, // Only 3 chunks written (maybe less than requested)
                    65536, // 64KB per chunk
                    196608 // 192KB total (3 * 64KB)
            );

            int bytesDecoded = response.decode(buffer, 0, buffer.length);

### Network

    * Default value for expendable pod priority cutoff in GCP deployment of Cluster Autoscaler changed from 0 to -10.
    * action required: users deploying workloads with priority lower than 0 may want to use priority lower than -10 to avoid triggering scale-up.

### Other notable changes

* Metadata Agent Improvements ([#66485](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/66485), [@bmoyles0117](https://github.com/bmoyles0117))

        assertEquals(1, singleKeyword.length);
        assertEquals("single", singleKeyword[0]);
    }

    @Test
    public void testParseQueryWithTooManyTerms() {
        // Test query with more than MAX_QUERY_TERM_NUM (5) terms
        String query = "one two three four five six seven";
        String field = "content";
        String[] keywords = SuggestUtil.parseQuery(query, field);
        assertNotNull(keywords);