fail("<" + expected.getMessage() + "> expected to contain <" + expectedMessage + ">");
      }
      return;
    }
    fail();
  }

  /** An object with a friendly {@link #toString()}. */
  private static final class TestObject {
    final int group;
    final int item;

    TestObject(int group, int item) {
      this.group = group;
      this.item = item;
    }

        fail("<" + expected.getMessage() + "> expected to contain <" + expectedMessage + ">");
      }
      return;
    }
    fail();
  }

  /** An object with a friendly {@link #toString()}. */
  private static final class TestObject {
    final int group;
    final int item;

    TestObject(int group, int item) {
      this.group = group;
      this.item = item;
    }

            addFieldToSource(sourceMap, "virtualHosts", virtualHosts);
        }
        return sourceMap;
    }

    protected void addFieldToSource(Map<String, Object> sourceMap, String field, Object value) {
        sourceMap.put(field, value);
    }

    // ===================================================================================
    //                                                                      Basic Override

   * restrictions</i>.
   */
  @Retention(RetentionPolicy.CLASS)
  @Target({ElementType.TYPE, ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.CONSTRUCTOR, ElementType.FIELD})
  @Documented
  @interface GwtIncompatible {
    String value();
  }

  private Partially() {}

 * {@code @GwtIncompatible} annotation in GWT itself</a>.
 *
 * @author Charles Fry
 */
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.CLASS)
@Target({ElementType.TYPE, ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.CONSTRUCTOR, ElementType.FIELD})
@Documented
@GwtCompatible
public @interface GwtIncompatible {
  /**
   * Describes why the annotated element is incompatible with GWT. Since this is generally due to a

	if (len(users1) != len(users4)) || (len(users1)-len(users2) != 3) || (len(users1)-len(users3) != 5) {
		t.Errorf("Offset should work")
	}

	DB.Where("name like ?", "OffsetUser%").Order("age desc").Find(&users1).Offset(3).Find(&users2).Offset(5).Find(&users3).Offset(-1).Find(&users4)

                      description: matchLabels is a map of {key,value} pairs. A single
                        {key,value} in the matchLabels map is equivalent to an element
                        of matchExpressions, whose key field is "key", the operator
                        is "In", and the values array contains only "value". The requirements
                        are ANDed.
                      type: object
                  type: object

Change

- Fixes accidental enablement of the new alpha `optionalOldSelf` API field in CustomResourceDefinition validation rules, which should only be allowed to be set when the CRDValidationRatcheting feature gate is enabled. Existing CustomResourceDefinition objects which have the field set will retain it on update, but new CustomResourceDefinition objects will not be permitted to set the field while the CRDValidationRatcheting feature gate is disabled. ([#122343](https://github.com...

Deployment-related operations.
     * Behavior change:
        * Deployment creates ReplicaSets instead of ReplicationControllers.
        * Scale subresource now has a new <code>targetSelector</code> field in its status. This field supports the new set-based selectors supported
by Deployments, but in a serialized format.
     * Spec change:

 * under the License.
 */
package org.apache.maven.artifact;

import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;

/**
 * Type safe enumeration for the artifact status field.
 *
 */
@Deprecated
public final class ArtifactStatus implements Comparable<ArtifactStatus> {
    /**
     * No trust - no information about status.
     */