monitor.leave();
    }
  }

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if this queue contains the specified element. More formally, returns
   * {@code true} if and only if this queue contains at least one element {@code e} such that {@code
   * o.equals(e)}.
   *
   * @param o object to be checked for containment in this queue
   * @return {@code true} if this queue contains the specified element
   */

  /**
   * The map does not throw {@code NullPointerException} on calls such as {@code
   * containsValue(null)}, {@code values().contains(null)} or {@code values().remove(null)}.
   */
  ALLOWS_NULL_VALUE_QUERIES,
  ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES(ALLOWS_NULL_VALUE_QUERIES),
  /**
   * The map does not throw {@code NullPointerException} on calls such as {@code
   * entrySet().contains(null)} or {@code entrySet().remove(null)}
   */

  internal class LegacyRedirectInterceptor : Interceptor {
    override fun intercept(chain: Interceptor.Chain): Response {
      val response = chain.proceed(chain.request())
      val code = response.code
      if (code != HTTP_TEMP_REDIRECT && code != HTTP_PERM_REDIRECT) return response
      val method = response.request.method
      if (method == "GET" || method == "HEAD") return response

 *
 * <p>As this interface extends {@code java.util.function.Function}, an instance of this type can be
 * used as a {@code java.util.function.Function} directly. To use a {@code
 * java.util.function.Function} in a context where a {@code com.google.common.base.Function} is
 * needed, use {@code function::apply}.
 *
 * <p>This interface is now a legacy type. Use {@code java.util.function.Function} (or the

   */

  /**
   * Creates an {@code ArrayTable} with the mappings in the provided table.
   *
   * <p>If {@code table} includes a mapping with row key {@code r} and a separate mapping with
   * column key {@code c}, the returned table contains a mapping with row key {@code r} and column
   * key {@code c}. If that row key / column key pair in not in {@code table}, the pair maps to
   * {@code null} in the generated table.
   *

    }
    return this;
  }

  /**
   * Adds each member of {@code elements} as a candidate for the top {@code k} elements. This
   * operation takes amortized linear time in the length of {@code elements}.
   *
   * <p>If all input data to this {@code TopKSelector} is in a single {@code Iterable}, prefer
   * {@link Ordering#leastOf(Iterable, int)}, which provides a simpler API for that use case.
   */

 *
 * <p>We encourage you to return {@code ListenableFuture} from your methods so that your users can
 * take advantage of the {@linkplain Futures utilities built atop the class}. The way that you will
 * create {@code ListenableFuture} instances depends on how you currently create {@code Future}
 * instances:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>If you receive them from an {@code java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService}, convert that

 *   <dt>From the IPv6 reserved documentation prefix ({@code 2001:db8::/32}), {@code "2001:db8::1"}.
 *   <dd>{@code 20 01 0d b8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01}
 *   <dt>An IPv6 "IPv4 compatible" (or "compat") address, {@code "::192.168.0.1"}.
 *   <dd>{@code 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c0 a8 00 01}
 *   <dt>An IPv6 "IPv4 mapped" address, {@code "::ffff:192.168.0.1"}.
 *   <dd>{@code 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff ff c0 a8 00 01}
 * </dl>
 *

		return false
	}
	prog.Scond = bits
	return true
}

// parseARM64Suffix parses the suffix attached to an ARM64 instruction.
// The input is a single string consisting of period-separated condition
// codes, such as ".P.W". An initial period is ignored.
func parseARM64Suffix(cond string) (uint8, bool) {
	if cond == "" {
		return 0, true
	}
	return parseARMCondition(cond, arm64LS, nil)
}

 *   }
 * }
 * }
 *
 * <h3>{@code Monitor}</h3>
 *
 * <p>This version adds some verbosity around the {@code Guard} objects, but removes that same
 * verbosity, and more, from the {@code get} and {@code set} methods. {@code Monitor} implements the
 * same efficient signaling as we had to hand-code in the {@code ReentrantLock} version above.
 * Finally, the programmer no longer has to hand-code the wait loop, and therefore doesn't have to