end = srcIndex + rDataLength;
        /* Apparently readRDataWireFormat can return 0 if resultCode != 0 in
        which case this will look indefinitely. Putting this else clause around
        the loop might fix that. But I would need to see a capture to confirm.
        if (resultCode != 0) {
            srcIndex += rDataLength;
        } else {
        */
        for (addrIndex = 0; srcIndex < end; addrIndex++) {

             * array. Incedentally when these andx smbs are created they are not
             * necessarily populated with header data because they're not writing
             * the header, only their body. But for whatever reason one might wish
             * to populate fields if the writeXxx operation needs this header data
             * for whatever reason. I copy over the uid here so it appears correct

```
{
  "Version": "2012-10-17",
  "Statement": [
	{

///

## Separating tests { #separating-tests }

In a real application, you probably would have your tests in a different file.

And your **FastAPI** application might also be composed of several files/modules, etc.

### **FastAPI** app file { #fastapi-app-file }

Let's say you have a file structure as described in [Bigger Applications](bigger-applications.md){.internal-link target=_blank}:

The main difference between various MinIO-KMS deployments is the KMS implementation. The following table helps you select the right option for your use case:

| KMS                                                                                          | Purpose                                                           |

   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): or we could make HOLES_FORBIDDEN a feature. Or we could declare that
   * implementations are permitted to throw IAE if a hole is requested, and we could update
   * test*Hole to permit IAE. (But might this ignore genuine bugs?) But see the TODO above
   * testLower, which could make this all unnecessary
   */
  public static Method[] getHoleMethods() {
    return new Method[] {

       "$hash = (Get-FileHash \"%WRAPPER_JAR%\" -Algorithm SHA256).Hash.ToLower();"^
       "If('%WRAPPER_SHA_256_SUM%' -ne $hash){"^
       "  Write-Error 'Error: Failed to validate Maven wrapper SHA-256, your Maven wrapper might be compromised.';"^
       "  Write-Error 'Investigate or delete %WRAPPER_JAR% to attempt a clean download.';"^
       "  Write-Error 'If you updated your Maven version, you need to update the specified wrapperSha256Sum property.';"^

public final class ArbitraryInstances {

  private static final Ordering<Field> BY_FIELD_NAME =
      new Ordering<Field>() {
        @Override
        public int compare(Field left, Field right) {
          return left.getName().compareTo(right.getName());
        }
      };

  /**
   * Returns a new {@code MatchResult} that corresponds to a successful match. Apache Harmony (used

   * all elements are so contained, {@code true} is returned, otherwise {@code false}.
   *
   * @param self a collection which might contain all elements in {@code c}
   * @param c a collection whose elements might be contained by {@code self}
   */
  static boolean containsAllImpl(Collection<?> self, Collection<?> c) {
    for (Object o : c) {
      if (!self.contains(o)) {

            want to analyze the set of transitive dependencies, in particular during early lifecycle phases where
            full dependency resolution might fail due to projects which haven't been built yet.
          </description>
        </field>
        <field>
          <name>dependencyCollection</name>
          <version>2.0.0+</version>