char[] testPassword = "CharArrayPass789!".toCharArray();
        NtlmPasswordAuthenticator auth = new NtlmPasswordAuthenticator("testuser", testPassword);

        // Verify password is stored correctly
        assertArrayEquals(testPassword, auth.getPasswordAsCharArray());
        assertEquals(new String(testPassword), auth.getPassword());

        // Verify that modifying original array doesn't affect stored password

                        .inactiveRequiredProjects(MODULE_B)
                        .expectResult(MODULE_C_2, INDEPENDENT_MODULE),
                scenario("Selected projects in wrong order are resumed correctly in order")
                        .activeRequiredProjects(MODULE_C_2, MODULE_B, MODULE_A)
                        .resumeFrom(MODULE_B)
                        .expectResult(MODULE_B, MODULE_C_2),

 * views are modifiable.
 *
 * <p>This class is not threadsafe when any concurrent operations update the multimap. Concurrent
 * read operations will work correctly. To allow concurrent update operations, wrap your multimap
 * with a call to {@link Multimaps#synchronizedListMultimap}.
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide article on <a href=

   * This ISE wouldn't actually bubble up but would get logged by ExecutionQueue. This obfuscated
   * the original error (which was not constructing ServiceManager correctly).
   */
  public void testPartiallyConstructedManager() {
    Logger logger = Logger.getLogger("global");
    logger.setLevel(Level.FINEST);
    TestLogHandler logHandler = new TestLogHandler();

        bb.put("NODE01".getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_16LE));
        bb.putShort((short) 0);

        referral.decode(testBuffer, 0, testBuffer.length);

        // First verify the referral was parsed correctly
        assertNotNull(referral.getRpath());
        assertNotNull(referral.getAltPath());
        assertNotNull(referral.getNode());
        assertEquals("\\\\server\\\\share", referral.getRpath());

 * <p>The guarantee provided by this class is that equal keys lead to the same lock (or semaphore),
 * i.e. {@code if (key1.equals(key2))} then {@code striped.get(key1) == striped.get(key2)} (assuming
 * {@link Object#hashCode()} is correctly implemented for the keys). Note that if {@code key1} is
 * <strong>not</strong> equal to {@code key2}, it is <strong>not</strong> guaranteed that {@code

            logger.warn("Failed to get object tags: bucket={}, path={}", bucketName, path, e);
        }
        return null;
    }

    /**
     * Preprocesses a URI to ensure it has the correct S3 protocol prefix.
     * @param uri the URI to preprocess
     * @return the preprocessed URI with s3:// prefix
     * @throws CrawlerSystemException if the URI is empty
     */

   */
  protected abstract I newTargetIterator();

  /**
   * Override this to verify anything after running a list of Stimuli.
   *
   * <p>For example, verify that calls to remove() actually removed the correct elements.
   *
   * @param elements the expected elements passed to the constructor, as mutated by {@code
   *     remove()}, {@code set()}, and {@code add()} calls
   */
  protected void verify(List<E> elements) {}

        VersionRange range2 = VersionRange.createFromVersionSpec("1.1");
        VersionRange mergedRange = range1.restrict(range2);
        // TODO current policy is to retain the original version - is this correct, do we need strategies or is that
        // handled elsewhere?
        //        assertEquals( "1.1", mergedRange.getRecommendedVersion().toString(), CHECK_VERSION_RECOMMENDATION );

chats permiten una "conversación más libre", es fácil hacer preguntas que son demasiado generales y más difíciles de responder, por lo que es posible que no recibas respuestas.

En GitHub, la plantilla te guiará para escribir la pregunta correcta para que puedas obtener más fácilmente una buena respuesta, o incluso resolver el problema por ti mismo antes de preguntar. Y en GitHub puedo asegurarme de responder siempre todo, incluso si lleva tiempo. No puedo hacer eso personalmente con los...