import org.junit.Assert;
import org.junit.Assume;
import org.junit.Ignore;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized.Parameters;
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;

import jcifs.CIFSContext;
import jcifs.CIFSException;
import jcifs.CloseableIterator;
import jcifs.ResolverType;
import jcifs.SmbConstants;

a dispatching to a particular plugin would occur because everything needs to be mediated through the host application. For a given action that is possible for a user to perform in the UI we need to know the URI that is to be used with its given parameters. That URI in turn must map internally to a method in a given component which belongs to a plugin. This mapping should actually be more generalized and it shouldn’t matter internally whether this maps to the core application or extension of the application...

   *       to construct the sample instances. In case of tie, the candidate constructors or
   *       factories are tried one after another until one can be used to construct sample
   *       instances.
   *   <li>For the constructor or static factory method used to construct instances, it's checked

   * @param formal The type whose type variables or itself is mapped to other type(s). It's almost
   *     always a bug if {@code formal} isn't a type variable and contains no type variable. Make
   *     sure you are passing the two parameters in the right order.
   * @param actual The type that the formal type variable(s) are mapped to. It can be or contain yet
   *     other type variables, in which case these type variables will be further resolved if

  private final double sumOfProductsOfDeltas;

  /**
   * Internal constructor. Users should use {@link PairedStatsAccumulator#snapshot}.
   *
   * <p>To ensure that the created instance obeys its contract, the parameters should satisfy the
   * following constraints. This is the callers responsibility and is not enforced here.
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>Both {@code xStats} and {@code yStats} must have the same {@code count}.

<img src="/img/tutorial/generate-clients/image08.png">

## Benefits

When using the automatically generated clients you would get **autocompletion** for:

* Methods.
* Request payloads in the body, query parameters, etc.
* Response payloads.

You would also have **inline errors** for everything.

    checkArgument(
        hasConstructorUsableByGetChecked(exceptionClass),
        "Futures.getChecked exception type (%s) must be an accessible class with an accessible "
            + "constructor whose parameters (if any) must be of type String and/or Throwable",
        exceptionClass);
  }

  private FuturesGetChecked() {}

> TLS certificates via a different domain for your FTP servers you may choose the above command line options.


### Custom Algorithms (SFTP)

Custom algorithms can be specified via command line parameters.
Algorithms are comma separated. 
Note that valid values does not in all cases represent default values.

`--sftp=pub-key-algos=...` specifies the supported client public key

 * </td></tr>
 *
 * <tr><td width="20%">
 * <code>smb1://MYGROUP/?SERVER=192.168.10.15</code></td><td>
 * SMB URLs support some query string parameters. In this example
 * the <code>SERVER</code> parameter is used to override the
 * server name service lookup to contact the server 192.168.10.15
 * (presumably known to be a master

    /**
     * Appends a quoted-string to a StringBuilder.
     *
     * RFC 2388 is rather vague about how one should escape special characters in form-data
     * parameters, and as it turns out Firefox and Chrome actually do rather different things, and
     * both say in their comments that they're not really sure what the right approach is. We go