* AnnotatedElement}, which {@code TypeVariable} began to extend only in Java 8. Those methods
   * refer only to types present in Java 7, so we could implement them in {@code TypeVariableImpl}
   * today. (We could probably then make {@code TypeVariableImpl} implement {@code AnnotatedElement}
   * so that we get partial compile-time checking.)
   *
   * <p>This workaround should be removed at a distant future time when we no longer support Java

              annotationClass, propertyName, annotationClass.getDeclaringClass()),
          annotationClass.getDeclaringClass(),
          returnType.getComponentType());
    }
  }

  // This is public so that tests for Feature enums we haven't yet imagined
  // can reuse it.
  public static <E extends Enum<?> & Feature<?>> void assertGoodFeatureEnum(
      Class<E> featureEnumClass) {

 * #iterator()} method after the first, and whose iterator is always unmodifiable.
 *
 * <p>The {@code Iterable} specification does not make it absolutely clear what should happen on a
 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind

```

where `3.12` is the `Python` version you wish to update.

Note, since it is still `pip` and `pip-compile` tools used under the hood, so
most of the command line arguments and features supported by those tools will be
acknowledged by the Bazel requirements updater command as well. For example, if
you wish the updater to consider pre-release versions simply pass `--pre`

        () -> {
          Object unused = getSubjectGenerator().create(array);
        });
  }

  /**
   * Returns the {@link Method} instance for {@link #testCreateWithNull_unsupported()} so that tests
   * can suppress it with {@code FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder.suppressing()} until <a
   * href="http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=5045147">Sun bug 5045147</a> is fixed.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible

 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could
 * support even a "normal" `TypeParameter<T>` when `<T>` has a nullable bound. (See the discussion
 * on TypeToken.where.) So, in the interest of failing fast and encouraging the user to switch to a
 * non-null bound if possible, let's require a non-null bound here.
 *
 * TODO(cpovirk): Elaborate on "wouldn't behave as users might expect."
 */

            // that would happen here should cause the build to fail at a later stage
            // (when actually parsing the POM) and will lead to a better exception being
            // displayed to the user, so just bail out and return false.
        }
        return false;
    }

	setupLogging()
	fixture := getTestFixure(ctx)
	netServer := fixture.netServer
	ztunnelServer := fixture.ztunnelServer
	nlDeps := fixture.nlDeps
	pod := buildConvincingPod(false)
	// this is usually called after add. so manually add the pod uid for now
	fakens := newFakeNs(123)
	closed := fakens.closed
	workload := WorkloadInfo{
		Workload: podToWorkload(pod),
		Netns:    fakens,
	}

    return newBuilder().strong().build();
  }

  /**
   * Returns a new thread-safe interner which retains a weak reference to each instance it has
   * interned, and so does not prevent these instances from being garbage-collected. This most
   * likely does not perform as well as {@link #newStrongInterner}, but is the best alternative when
   * the memory usage of that implementation is unacceptable.

  /** Tests that the {@link Future#get(long, TimeUnit)} method times out correctly. */
  public void testTimeoutOnGetWorksCorrectly() throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {

    // The task thread waits for the latch, so we expect a timeout here.
    try {
      future.get(20, MILLISECONDS);
      fail("Should have timed out trying to get the value.");
    } catch (TimeoutException expected) {
    } finally {
      latch.countDown();