Debido a que este código se ejecuta antes de que la aplicación **comience** a tomar requests, y justo después de que **termine** de manejarlos, cubre todo el **lifespan** de la aplicación (la palabra "lifespan" será importante en un momento 😉).

  }

  public void testConcat() {
    assertThat(Floats.concat()).isEqualTo(EMPTY);
    assertThat(Floats.concat(EMPTY)).isEqualTo(EMPTY);
    assertThat(Floats.concat(EMPTY, EMPTY, EMPTY)).isEqualTo(EMPTY);
    assertThat(Floats.concat(ARRAY1)).isEqualTo(ARRAY1);
    assertThat(Floats.concat(ARRAY1)).isNotSameInstanceAs(ARRAY1);
    assertThat(Floats.concat(EMPTY, ARRAY1, EMPTY)).isEqualTo(ARRAY1);

  }

  public void testConcat() {
    assertThat(Floats.concat()).isEqualTo(EMPTY);
    assertThat(Floats.concat(EMPTY)).isEqualTo(EMPTY);
    assertThat(Floats.concat(EMPTY, EMPTY, EMPTY)).isEqualTo(EMPTY);
    assertThat(Floats.concat(ARRAY1)).isEqualTo(ARRAY1);
    assertThat(Floats.concat(ARRAY1)).isNotSameInstanceAs(ARRAY1);
    assertThat(Floats.concat(EMPTY, ARRAY1, EMPTY)).isEqualTo(ARRAY1);

    assertThat(Longs.concat()).isEqualTo(EMPTY);
    assertThat(Longs.concat(EMPTY)).isEqualTo(EMPTY);
    assertThat(Longs.concat(EMPTY, EMPTY, EMPTY)).isEqualTo(EMPTY);
    assertThat(Longs.concat(ARRAY1)).isEqualTo(ARRAY1);
    assertThat(Longs.concat(ARRAY1)).isNotSameInstanceAs(ARRAY1);
    assertThat(Longs.concat(EMPTY, ARRAY1, EMPTY)).isEqualTo(ARRAY1);

  }

  public void testConcat() {
    assertThat(Shorts.concat()).isEqualTo(EMPTY);
    assertThat(Shorts.concat(EMPTY)).isEqualTo(EMPTY);
    assertThat(Shorts.concat(EMPTY, EMPTY, EMPTY)).isEqualTo(EMPTY);
    assertThat(Shorts.concat(ARRAY1)).isEqualTo(ARRAY1);
    assertThat(Shorts.concat(ARRAY1)).isNotSameInstanceAs(ARRAY1);
    assertThat(Shorts.concat(EMPTY, ARRAY1, EMPTY)).isEqualTo(ARRAY1);

En lugar de eso, al ser un sistema "asíncrono", una vez terminado, la tarea puede esperar un poco en la cola (algunos microsegundos) para que la computadora / programa termine lo que salió a hacer, y luego regrese para tomar los resultados y continuar trabajando con ellos.

    assertThat(Ints.concat()).isEqualTo(EMPTY);
    assertThat(Ints.concat(EMPTY)).isEqualTo(EMPTY);
    assertThat(Ints.concat(EMPTY, EMPTY, EMPTY)).isEqualTo(EMPTY);
    assertThat(Ints.concat(ARRAY1)).isEqualTo(ARRAY1);
    assertThat(Ints.concat(ARRAY1)).isNotSameInstanceAs(ARRAY1);
    assertThat(Ints.concat(EMPTY, ARRAY1, EMPTY)).isEqualTo(ARRAY1);
    assertThat(Ints.concat(ARRAY1, ARRAY1, ARRAY1))

      Integer[] suffix = {86, 99};
      Integer[] all = concat(concat(prefix, elements), suffix);
      return makeArray(all).subArray(2, elements.length + 2).asList();
    }
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // used only from suite
  private static Integer[] concat(Integer[] a, Integer[] b) {
    return ObjectArrays.concat(a, b, Integer.class);
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible

   * stream may perform better.
   *
   * @see Stream#concat(Stream, Stream)
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // could probably be avoided with a forwarding Spliterator
  @SafeVarargs
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> Stream<T> concat(Stream<? extends T>... streams) {
    // TODO(lowasser): consider an implementation that can support SUBSIZED

   * load data through their streams). Prefer using the {@link #concat(Iterable)} overload if
   * possible.
   *
   * @param sources the sources to concatenate
   * @return a {@code CharSource} containing the concatenated data
   * @throws NullPointerException if any of {@code sources} is {@code null}
   * @since 15.0
   */
  public static CharSource concat(Iterator<? extends CharSource> sources) {