assertEquals(concreteImplementation, cacheMap.get(key));
            assertNotEquals(oldEntry, cacheMap.get(key));
        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Complex Scenarios Tests")
    class ComplexScenariosTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle multiple fixup operations")
        void testMultipleFixupOperations() {

### Est-ce que la concurrence est mieux que le parallélisme ?

Nope ! C'est ça la morale de l'histoire.

La concurrence est différente du parallélisme. C'est mieux sur des scénarios **spécifiques** qui impliquent beaucoup d'attente. À cause de ça, c'est généralement bien meilleur que le parallélisme pour le développement d'applications web. Mais pas pour tout.

### Is concurrency better than parallelism? { #is-concurrency-better-than-parallelism }

Nope! That's not the moral of the story.

Concurrency is different than parallelism. And it is better on **specific** scenarios that involve a lot of waiting. Because of that, it generally is a lot better than parallelism for web application development. But not for everything.

So, to balance that out, imagine the following short story:

- Cleanup subnet in frontend IP configs to prevent huge subnet request bodies in some scenarios. ([#98290](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/98290), [@nilo19](https://github.com/nilo19)) [SIG Cloud Provider]

		// Optimization for certain applications like
		// - Cohesity
		// - Actifio, Splunk etc.
		// which send ListObjects requests where the actual object
		// itself is the prefix and max-keys=1 in such scenarios
		// we can simply verify locally if such an object exists
		// to avoid the need for ListObjects().
		objInfo, err := z.GetObjectInfo(ctx, bucket, prefix, ObjectOptions{NoLock: true})
		if err == nil {

// as a hex encoded string
func (p *PutObjReader) MD5CurrentHexString() string {
	md5sumCurr := p.rawReader.MD5Current()
	var appendHyphen bool
	// md5sumcurr is not empty in two scenarios
	// - server is running in strict compatibility mode
	// - client set Content-Md5 during PUT operation
	if len(md5sumCurr) == 0 {
		// md5sumCurr is only empty when we are running
		// in non-compatibility mode.

### Bug or Regression

- An inefficient lock in EndpointSlice controller metrics cache has been reworked. Network programming latency may be significantly reduced in certain scenarios, especially in clusters with a large number of Services. ([#107169](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/107169), [@robscott](https://github.com/robscott)) [SIG Apps and Network]

- QueueingHint implementation for NodeAffinity is reverted because we found potential scenarios where events that make Pods schedulable could be missed. ([#122285](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/122285), [@sanposhiho](https://github.com/sanposhiho)) [SIG Scheduling]

                th.close();
            } else {
                // Let connection pooling handle cleanup - this improves performance
                // for scenarios where the same file or directory is accessed multiple times
                log.trace("Tree handle released to connection pool for reuse");
                // The connection pool will handle cleanup based on its own timeout settings

					storageLogOnceIf(ctx, err, "read-data-add-legacy-"+dstFilePath)
				}
				legacyPreserved = true
			}
		}
	} else {
		// It is possible that some drives may not have `xl.meta` file
		// in such scenarios verify if at least `part.1` files exist
		// to verify for legacy version.
		if formatLegacy {
			// We only need this code if we are moving
			// from `xl.json` to `xl.meta`, we can avoid