* Since reflection can't tell the difference between <T> and <T extends Object>, it doesn't
       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",
    })
    <T extends Object> void withObjectBound(List<T> list) {}

       * Since reflection can't tell the difference between <T> and <T extends Object>, it doesn't
       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",
    })
    <T extends Object> void withObjectBound(List<T> list) {}

INHERIT: ../en/mkdocs.maybe-insiders.yml
site_name: FastAPI
site_description: FastAPI framework, high performance, easy to learn, fast to code, ready for production
site_url: https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/
theme:
  name: material
  custom_dir: ../en/overrides
  palette:
  - media: "(prefers-color-scheme)"
    toggle:
      icon: material/lightbulb-auto
      name: Switch to light mode
  - media: '(prefers-color-scheme: light)'
    scheme: default

    }

    public MojoDescriptor getMojo(String goal) {
        if (getMojos() == null) {
            return null; // no mojo in this POM
        }

        // TODO could we use a map? Maybe if the parent did that for components too, as this is too vulnerable to
        // changes above not being propagated to the map
        for (MojoDescriptor desc : getMojos()) {
            if (goal.equals(desc.getGoal())) {

   *
   * <p>Without special handling, it's possible to have reads of the open stream start <i>before</i>
   * the offset at which the slice is supposed to start.
   */
  // TODO(cgdecker): Maybe add a test for this to ByteSourceTester
  public void testSlice_appendingAfterSlicing() throws IOException {
    // Source of length 5
    AppendableByteSource source = new AppendableByteSource(newPreFilledByteArray(5));

   *
   * <p>Without special handling, it's possible to have reads of the open stream start <i>before</i>
   * the offset at which the slice is supposed to start.
   */
  // TODO(cgdecker): Maybe add a test for this to ByteSourceTester
  public void testSlice_appendingAfterSlicing() throws IOException {
    // Source of length 5
    AppendableByteSource source = new AppendableByteSource(newPreFilledByteArray(5));

			}
		default:
			// This is where we'd set it to -1 (at least
			// if body != NoBody) to mean unknown, but
			// that broke people during the Go 1.8 testing
			// period. People depend on it being 0 I
			// guess. Maybe retry later. See Issue 18117.
		}
		// For client requests, Request.ContentLength of 0
		// means either actually 0, or unknown. The only way
		// to explicitly say that the ContentLength is zero is

    HashTestUtils.assertInvariants(Hashing.fingerprint2011());
    assertEquals("Hashing.fingerprint2011()", Hashing.fingerprint2011().toString());
  }

  @AndroidIncompatible // slow TODO(cpovirk): Maybe just reduce iterations under Android.
  public void testGoodFastHash() {
    for (int i = 1; i < 200; i += 17) {
      HashFunction hasher = Hashing.goodFastHash(i);
      assertTrue(hasher.bits() >= i);

    as a dependency. All other OAuth2 classes inherit from it and customize it for
    each OAuth2 flow.

    You normally would not create a new class inheriting from it but use one of the
    existing subclasses, and maybe compose them if you want to support multiple flows.

    Read more about it in the
    [FastAPI docs for Security](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/tutorial/security/).
    """

    def __init__(
        self,

// the MD5 of the individual part checksums but it still contains
// the number of parts as suffix.
//
// Instead, the ETag is kind of unpredictable for S3 clients when
// an object is encrypted using SSE-C or SSE-KMS. Maybe AWS S3
// computes the ETag as MD5 of the encrypted content but there is
// no way to verify this assumption since the encryption happens
// inside AWS S3.
// Therefore, S3 clients must not make any assumption about ETags