* is less error-prone and more readable than code using {@code ReentrantLock}, without significant
 * performance loss. {@code Monitor} even has the potential for performance gain by optimizing the
 * evaluation and signaling of conditions. Signaling is entirely <a
 * href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monitor_(synchronization)#Implicit_signaling">implicit</a>. By

// Attempts to evaluate `output`. This will only be possible if `output` doesn't
// depend on any graph inputs (this function is safe to call if this isn't the
// case though).
//
// If the evaluation is successful, this function returns true and `output`s
// value is returned in `result`. Otherwise returns false. An error status is
// returned if something is wrong with the graph or input. Note that this may

"minio.imagePullSecrets" -}} {{/* Helm 2.11 supports the assignment of a value to a variable defined in a different scope, but Helm 2.9 and 2.10 does not support it, so we need to implement this if-else logic. Also, we can not use a single if because lazy evaluation is not an option */}} {{- if .Values.global }} {{- if .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{- range .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} - name: {{ . }} {{- end }} {{- else if .Values.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{ toYaml...

"minio.imagePullSecrets" -}} {{/* Helm 2.11 supports the assignment of a value to a variable defined in a different scope, but Helm 2.9 and 2.10 does not support it, so we need to implement this if-else logic. Also, we can not use a single if because lazy evaluation is not an option */}} {{- if .Values.global }} {{- if .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{- range .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} - name: {{ . }} {{- end }} {{- else if .Values.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{ toYaml...

"minio.imagePullSecrets" -}} {{/* Helm 2.11 supports the assignment of a value to a variable defined in a different scope, but Helm 2.9 and 2.10 does not support it, so we need to implement this if-else logic. Also, we can not use a single if because lazy evaluation is not an option */}} {{- if .Values.global }} {{- if .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{- range .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} - name: {{ . }} {{- end }} {{- else if .Values.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{ toYaml...

"minio.imagePullSecrets" -}} {{/* Helm 2.11 supports the assignment of a value to a variable defined in a different scope, but Helm 2.9 and 2.10 does not support it, so we need to implement this if-else logic. Also, we can not use a single if because lazy evaluation is not an option */}} {{- if .Values.global }} {{- if .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{- range .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} - name: {{ . }} {{- end }} {{- else if .Values.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{ toYaml...

"minio.imagePullSecrets" -}} {{/* Helm 2.11 supports the assignment of a value to a variable defined in a different scope, but Helm 2.9 and 2.10 does not support it, so we need to implement this if-else logic. Also, we can not use a single if because lazy evaluation is not an option */}} {{- if .Values.global }} {{- if .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{- range .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} - name: {{ . }} {{- end }} {{- else if .Values.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{ toYaml...

"minio.imagePullSecrets" -}} {{/* Helm 2.11 supports the assignment of a value to a variable defined in a different scope, but Helm 2.9 and 2.10 does not support it, so we need to implement this if-else logic. Also, we can not use a single if because lazy evaluation is not an option */}} {{- if .Values.global }} {{- if .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{- range .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} - name: {{ . }} {{- end }} {{- else if .Values.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{ toYaml...

</pre>

<h3 id="constants">Constants</h3>

<p>
Although the assembler takes its guidance from the Plan 9 assemblers,
it is a distinct program, so there are some differences.
One is in constant evaluation.
Constant expressions in the assembler are parsed using Go's operator
precedence, not the C-like precedence of the original.
Thus <code>3&amp;1&lt;&lt;2</code> is 4, not 0—it parses as <code>(3&amp;1)&lt;&lt;2</code>

- In the course of admitting a single request, the ValidatingAdmissionPolicy plugin will perform no more than one authorization check per unique authorizer expression. All evaluations of identical authorizer expressions will produce the same decision. ([#116443](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/116443), [@benluddy](https://github.com/benluddy)) [SIG API Machinery and Testing]