return CollectCollectors.toImmutableSet();
  }

  /**
   * Returns the empty immutable set. Preferred over {@link Collections#emptySet} for code
   * consistency, and because the return type conveys the immutability guarantee.
   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> the instance returned is a singleton.
   */

    assertEquals(initialFiles.length + 1, updatedFiles.length);
}
```

## 9. Error Handling

### 9.1 Cache Consistency
```java
public class CacheConsistencyManager {
    public void handleInconsistency(String directoryPath, String fileName) {
        log.warn("Cache inconsistency detected for: {}/{}", directoryPath, fileName);
        
        // Invalidate affected cache entries

   *
   * <p>Unlike the other {@code EndpointPair}-accepting methods, this method does not throw if the
   * endpoints are unordered and the graph is directed; it simply returns {@code false}. This is for
   * consistency with the behavior of {@link Collection#contains(Object)} (which does not generally
   * throw if the object cannot be present in the collection), and the desire to have this method's

   *
   * <p>Unlike the other {@code EndpointPair}-accepting methods, this method does not throw if the
   * endpoints are unordered and the graph is directed; it simply returns {@code false}. This is for
   * consistency with the behavior of {@link Collection#contains(Object)} (which does not generally
   * throw if the object cannot be present in the collection), and the desire to have this method's

then <i>A</i> is synchronized before <i>B</i>.
All the atomic operations executed in a program behave as though executed
in some sequentially consistent order.
</p>

<p>
The preceding definition has the same semantics as C++’s sequentially consistent atomics
and Java’s <code>volatile</code> variables.
</p>

<h3 id="finalizer">Finalizers</h3>

<p>

    /**
     * Deletes a crawling information record and all its associated parameters.
     * First deletes all related CrawlingInfoParam records, then deletes the main record
     * with immediate refresh to ensure consistency.
     *
     * @param crawlingInfo the crawling information entity to delete
     */
    public void delete(final CrawlingInfo crawlingInfo) {
        setupDeleteCondition(crawlingInfo);

    }

    /**
     * @return <code>true</code> if the Mojo is online, <code>false</code> otherwise.
     */
    // blech! this isn't even intelligible as a method name. provided for
    // consistency...
    public boolean isOnlineRequired() {
        return onlineRequired;
    }

    /**
     * @return <code>true</code> if the Mojo is online, <code>false</code> otherwise.
     */

        assertEquals(longId.toString(), rule.getRuleId());

        ResponseData responseData = new ResponseData();
        assertTrue(rule.match(responseData));
    }

    /**
     * Test rule behavior consistency
     */
    public void test_ruleBehaviorConsistency() {
        TestRule rule = new TestRule("consistentRule", new TestResponseProcessor("consistentProcessor"), true);

        assertEquals(0x20, nbtAddress.getNameType());
    }

    @Test
    void testHashCode() {
        // Test hashCode consistency
        mockName = new Name(mockConfig, "TEST1", 0x20, null);
        Name mockName2 = new Name(mockConfig, "TEST2", 0x20, null);

      throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      return getKey() + "=" + getValue();
    }
  }

  // TODO(fry): Separate logic for consistency between emul and nonemul implementation.
  // TODO(fry): Look into Maps.KeySet and Maps.Values, which can ideally be reused here but are
  // currently only package visible.