* instance.
       */
      super("");
    }

    @Override
    Comparable<?> endpoint() {
      throw new IllegalStateException("range unbounded on this side");
    }

    @Override
    boolean isLessThan(Comparable<?> value) {
      return true;
    }

    @Override
    BoundType typeAsLowerBound() {
      throw new IllegalStateException();
    }

nt.getElementsByTagName("body")[0];a.each(e,function(b,d){if(d=a.trim(d),0===d.length||a.formUtils.hasLoadedModule(d))g();else{var e=c+d+(".js"===d.slice(-3)?"":".js"),f=document.createElement("SCRIPT");"function"==typeof define&&define.amd?require([e+(".dev.js"===e.slice(-7)?h:"")],g):(f.type="text/javascript",f.onload=g,f.src=e+(".dev.js"===e.slice(-7)?h:""),f.onerror=function(){a.formUtils.warn("Unable to load form validation module "+e,!0),g()},f.onreadystatechange=function(){"complete"!==th...

  }

  /**
   * Configures the given map maker to use weak keys, if possible; does nothing otherwise (i.e., in
   * GWT). This is sometimes acceptable, when only server-side code could generate enough volume
   * that reclamation becomes important.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  static MapMaker tryWeakKeys(MapMaker mapMaker) {
    return mapMaker.weakKeys();
  }

   * trouble than just using Object.class.)
   *
   * Then we declare the getters for these fields as @GwtIncompatible so that no one can try to use
   * them under J2CL—or, as an unfortunate side effect, under GWT. We do still give the fields
   * themselves their proper values under GWT, since GWT's EnumMap does need the Class instance.
   *

9Hu\u2019] LT",lastWeek:"LLL",sameElse:"L"},relativeTime:{future:function(e){var a=e;return a=-1!==e.indexOf("jaj")?a.slice(0,-3)+"leS":-1!==e.indexOf("jar")?a.slice(0,-3)+"waQ":-1!==e.indexOf("DIS")?a.slice(0,-3)+"nem":a+" pIq"},past:function(e){var a=e;return a=-1!==e.indexOf("jaj")?a.slice(0,-3)+"Hu\u2019":-1!==e.indexOf("jar")?a.slice(0,-3)+"wen":-1!==e.indexOf("DIS")?a.slice(0,-3)+"ben":a+" ret"},s:"puS lup",ss:Wr,m:"wa\u2019 tup",mm:Wr,h:"wa\u2019 rep",hh:Wr,d:"wa\u2019 jaj",dd:Wr,M:"wa\u2019...

  integrity sha512-7++dFhtcx3353uBaq8DDR4NuxBetBzC7ZQOhmTQInHEd6bSrXdiEyzCvG07Z44UYdLShWUyXt5M/yhz8ekcb1A==

side-channel@^1.0.4:
  version "1.0.4"
  resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/side-channel/-/side-channel-1.0.4.tgz#efce5c8fdc104ee751b25c58d4290011fa5ea2cf"
  integrity sha512-q5XPytqFEIKHkGdiMIrY10mvLRvnQh42/+GoBlFW3b2LXLE2xxJpZFdm94we0BaoV3RwJyGqg5wS7epxTv0Zvw==

   */
  inner class FramingSource internal constructor(
    /** Maximum number of bytes to buffer before reporting a flow control error. */
    private val maxByteCount: Long,
    /**
     * True if either side has cleanly shut down this stream. We will receive no more bytes beyond
     * those already in the buffer.
     */
    internal var finished: Boolean,
  ) : Source {

     * regrettable implementations like our own Sets.filter, Collection.size() is sometimes a
     * linear-time operation, and it can even have side effects. Thus, we limit the special case to
     * List, which is _even more likely_ to have size() implemented to be fast and side-effect-free.
     *
     * We could consider recognizing specific other collections as safe (like ImmutableCollection,

      AtomicReferenceArray<ReferenceEntry<K, V>> table = segment.table;
      for (int i = 0; i < table.length(); i++) {
        for (ReferenceEntry<K, V> e = table.get(i); e != null; e = e.getNext()) {
          if (map.isLive(e, now)) {
            result++;
          }
        }
      }
    }
    return result;
  }

  public void testClear() {
    LocalCache<Object, Object> map =

       * need to clear our reference to the TimeoutFuture is the reason we use a *static* nested
       * class with a manual reference back to the "containing" class.)
       *
       * This has the nice-ish side effect of limiting reentrancy: run() calls
       * timeoutFuture.setException() calls run(). That reentrancy would already be harmless, since
       * timeoutFuture can be set (and delegate cancelled) only once. (And "set only once" is