count += values.length();
      return this;
    }

    private void ensureRoomFor(int numberToAdd) {
      int newCount = count + numberToAdd; // TODO(kevinb): check overflow now?
      if (newCount > array.length) {
        array = Arrays.copyOf(array, expandedCapacity(array.length, newCount));
      }
    }

    // Unfortunately this is pasted from ImmutableCollection.Builder.

    }

    public void test_intervalRule_isTarget_dayOverflow() {
        IntervalRule rule = new IntervalRule("10:00", "18:00", "1", 1000); // Sunday only

        // Test day overflow (day 8 should be treated as day 1)
        // For same-day rules, it should check the day directly
        assertTrue(rule.isTarget(12, 30, 8)); // Should be treated as day 1 (Sunday)

   * thrown by {@linkplain MoreExecutors#directExecutor direct execution}) will be caught and
   * logged.
   *
   * <p>Note: If your listener is lightweight -- and will not cause stack overflow by completing
   * more futures or adding more {@code directExecutor()} listeners inline -- consider {@link
   * MoreExecutors#directExecutor}. Otherwise, avoid it: See the warnings on the docs for {@code
   * directExecutor}.

      // as a long, without risk of overflow:
      long numerator = (long) index * (dataset.length - 1);
      // Since scale is a positive int, index is in [0, scale], and (dataset.length - 1) is a
      // non-negative int, we can do long-arithmetic on index * (dataset.length - 1) / scale to get
      // a rounded ratio and a remainder which can be expressed as ints, without risk of overflow:

        assertArrayEquals(testData, copiedData);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should check if error response for buffer overflow status")
    void testIsErrorResponseStatusBufferOverflow() throws Exception {
        // Given - Use reflection to set status
        Field statusField = ServerMessageBlock2.class.getDeclaredField("status");

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

    long product = LongMath.factorials[startingNumber - 1];
    // Strip off 2s from this value.
    int shift = Long.numberOfTrailingZeros(product);
    product >>= shift;

    // Use floor(log2(num)) + 1 to prevent overflow of multiplication.
    int productBits = LongMath.log2(product, FLOOR) + 1;
    int bits = LongMath.log2(startingNumber, FLOOR) + 1;
    // Check for the next power of two boundary, to save us a CLZ operation.

            assertThrows(ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException.class, () -> request.writeBytesWireFormat(buffer, 0));
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle buffer overflow protection")
        void testBufferOverflowProtection() {
            Smb2Lock[] locks = new Smb2Lock[] { new Smb2Lock(0L, 100L, Smb2Lock.SMB2_LOCKFLAG_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK),

        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle buffer overflow protection")
        void testBufferOverflowProtection() {
            request.setReadLength(65536);

            byte[] smallBuffer = new byte[48]; // Smaller than required 49 bytes

            // Should not overflow buffer

      } else {
        utf8Length += encodedLengthGeneral(sequence, i);
        break;
      }
    }

    if (utf8Length < utf16Length) {
      // Necessary and sufficient condition for overflow because of maximum 3x expansion
      throw new IllegalArgumentException(
          "UTF-8 length does not fit in int: " + (utf8Length + (1L << 32)));
    }
    return utf8Length;
  }