// without declaring an explicit or implicit dependency. This can lead to incorrect results being produced, depending on what order the tasks are executed.
        tasks.named("publishGradleDistributionPublicationToRemoteRepository") {
            dependsOn("signLocalPublication")
        }
        tasks.named("publishLocalPublicationToLocalRepository") {

        with(standardError) {
            files.forEach {
                assertContains("API changes in file '${it.name}' should be in alphabetical order (by type and member), yet these changes were not:\n")
            }
            changes?.forEach { assertContains(it.toString()) }
            assertContains(cleanupHint)
        }
    }

    private

  /**
   * Starts a {@link ClosingFuture} pipeline with a {@link ListenableFuture}.
   *
   * <p>{@code future}'s value will not be closed when the pipeline is done even if {@code V}
   * implements {@link AutoCloseable}. In order to start a pipeline with a value that will be closed
   * when the pipeline is done, use {@link #submit(ClosingCallable, Executor)} instead.
   */

 * }
 *
 * <p>Note that this try-catch-finally block is not equivalent to a try-catch-finally block using
 * try-with-resources. To get the equivalent of that, you must wrap the above code in <i>another</i>
 * try block in order to catch any exception that may be thrown (including from the call to {@code
 * close()}).
 *
 * <p>This pattern ensures the following:
 *
 * <ul>

col-12{-ms-flex:0 0 100%;flex:0 0 100%;max-width:100%}.order-first{-ms-flex-order:-1;order:-1}.order-last{-ms-flex-order:13;order:13}.order-0{-ms-flex-order:0;order:0}.order-1{-ms-flex-order:1;order:1}.order-2{-ms-flex-order:2;order:2}.order-3{-ms-flex-order:3;order:3}.order-4{-ms-flex-order:4;order:4}.order-5{-ms-flex-order:5;order:5}.order-6{-ms-flex-order:6;order:6}.order-7{-ms-flex-order:7;order:7}.order-8{-ms-flex-order:8;order:8}.order-9{-ms-flex-order:9;order:9}.order-10{-ms-flex-order:10...

import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.LinkedHashMap;
import java.util.Map;

/**
 * Implementation of {@link Table} using linked hash tables. This guarantees predictable iteration
 * order of the various views.
 *
 * <p>The views returned by {@link #column}, {@link #columnKeySet()}, and {@link #columnMap()} have
 * iterators that don't support {@code remove()}. Otherwise, all optional operations are supported.

import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.LinkedHashMap;
import java.util.Map;

/**
 * Implementation of {@link Table} using linked hash tables. This guarantees predictable iteration
 * order of the various views.
 *
 * <p>The views returned by {@link #column}, {@link #columnKeySet()}, and {@link #columnMap()} have
 * iterators that don't support {@code remove()}. Otherwise, all optional operations are supported.

)

// IsRegisterShift reports whether the token is one of the ARM register shift operators.
func IsRegisterShift(r ScanToken) bool {
	return ROT <= r && r <= LSH // Order looks backwards because these are negative.
}

func (t ScanToken) String() string {
	switch t {
	case scanner.EOF:
		return "EOF"
	case scanner.Ident:
		return "identifier"
	case scanner.Int:

     * {@link NtTransQuerySecurityDesc#writeParametersWireFormat(byte[], int)}.
     */
    private static byte[] expectedParameters(int fid, int securityInformation) {
        ByteBuffer bb = ByteBuffer.allocate(8).order(ByteOrder.LITTLE_ENDIAN);
        bb.putShort((short) fid);
        bb.put((byte) 0x00); // Reserved
        bb.put((byte) 0x00); // Reserved
        bb.putInt(securityInformation);
        return bb.array();
    }

         * NOTE: This is primarily to keep backward-compat with Maven 2.x which did not validate that dependencies are
         * unique within a single POM. Upon multiple declarations, 2.x just kept the last one but retained the order of
         * the first occurrence. So when we're in lenient/compat mode, we have to deal with such broken POMs and mimic