## Fixe a sua versão de `fastapi`

A primeira coisa que você deve fazer é "fixar" a versão do **FastAPI** que você está utilizando na mais atual, na qual você sabe que funciona corretamente para o seu aplicativo.

Por exemplo, supondo que você está usando a versão `0.45.0` em sua aplicação.

Caso você utilize o arquivo `requirements.txt`, você poderia especificar a versão com:

  // The reported versions per API server instance.
  // +optional
  // +listType=map
  // +listMapKey=apiServerID
  repeated ServerStorageVersion storageVersions = 1;

  // If all API server instances agree on the same encoding storage version,
  // then this field is set to that version. Otherwise this field is left empty.
  // API servers should finish updating its storageVersionStatus entry before

import okhttp3.internal.connection.RealRoutePlanner
import okhttp3.internal.connection.RouteDatabase

/**
 * Manages reuse of HTTP and HTTP/2 connections for reduced network latency. HTTP requests that
 * share the same [Address] may share a [Connection]. This class implements the policy
 * of which connections to keep open for future use.
 *
 * @constructor Create a new connection pool with tuning parameters appropriate for a single-user

       */
      ) {
        continue;
      }
      Class<?> clazz = info.load();
      try {
        Method unused = clazz.getDeclaredMethod("writeReplace");
        continue; // It overrides writeReplace, so it's safe.
      } catch (NoSuchMethodException e) {
        // This is a class whose supertypes we want to examine. We'll do that below.
      }
      Optional<Class<?>> supersWithPackagePrivateWriteReplace =

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

}
</style>

<h2 id="introduction">Introduction</h2>

<p>
The Go memory model specifies the conditions under which
reads of a variable in one goroutine can be guaranteed to
observe values produced by writes to the same variable in a different goroutine.
</p>


<h3 id="advice">Advice</h3>

<p>
Programs that modify data being simultaneously accessed by multiple goroutines
must serialize such access.
</p>

<p>