*
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> avoid <i>direct</i> usage of {@link ImmutableCollection} as a type (just as
 * with {@link Collection} itself). Prefer subtypes such as {@link ImmutableSet} or {@link
 * ImmutableList}, which have well-defined {@link #equals} semantics, thus avoiding a common source
 * of bugs and confusion.
 *
 * <h3>About <i>all</i> {@code Immutable-} collections</h3>
 *

    // merged into POM being built. Once the POM builder has this plugin information, versions can be assigned
    // by the POM builder because they will have to be defined in plugin management. Once this is setComplete then it
    // can be passed back so that the default configuration information can be populated.
    //

`MultipartBody.Builder` can build sophisticated request bodies compatible with HTML file upload forms. Each part of a multipart request body is itself a request body, and can define its own headers. If present, these headers should describe the part body, such as its `Content-Disposition`. The `Content-Length` and `Content-Type` headers are added automatically if they're available.

See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
==============================================================================*/
#ifndef TENSORFLOW_C_EAGER_C_API_TEST_UTIL_H_
#define TENSORFLOW_C_EAGER_C_API_TEST_UTIL_H_

#include <vector>

#include "tensorflow/c/eager/c_api.h"
#include "tensorflow/c/eager/c_api_experimental.h"
#include "tensorflow/c/tf_datatype.h"

	"cmd/internal/sys"
)

// TODO: configure the architecture

var testOut *strings.Builder // Gathers output when testing.

// append adds the Prog to the end of the program-thus-far.
// If doLabel is set, it also defines the labels collect for this Prog.
func (p *Parser) append(prog *obj.Prog, cond string, doLabel bool) {
	if cond != "" {
		switch p.arch.Family {
		case sys.ARM:
			if !arch.ARMConditionCodes(prog, cond) {

 * under the License.
 */
package org.apache.maven.repository.metadata;

import org.apache.maven.artifact.ArtifactScopeEnum;

/**
 * metadata graph edge - combination of version, scope and depth define
 * an edge in the graph
 *
 *
 */
@Deprecated
public class MetadataGraphEdge {
    String version;
    ArtifactScopeEnum scope;
    int depth = -1;
    int pomOrder = -1;
    boolean resolved = true;

   * #entriesDiffering()} of the two instances are equal.
   */
  @Override
  boolean equals(@CheckForNull Object object);

  /**
   * Returns the hash code for this instance. This is defined as the hash code of
   *
   * <pre>{@code
   * Arrays.asList(entriesOnlyOnLeft(), entriesOnlyOnRight(),
   *     entriesInCommon(), entriesDiffering())
   * }</pre>
   */
  @Override
  int hashCode();

            options.addOption(Option.builder(CACHE_ARTIFACT_NOT_FOUND)
                    .longOpt("cache-artifact-not-found")
                    .hasArg()
                    .desc(
                            "Defines caching behaviour for 'not found' artifacts. Supported values are 'true' (default), 'false'.")
                    .build());
            options.addOption(Option.builder(STRICT_ARTIFACT_DESCRIPTOR_POLICY)

---

Hier ist, was Sie beachten sollten und wie Sie einen Pull Request überprüfen:

### Das Problem verstehen

* Stellen Sie zunächst sicher, dass Sie **das Problem verstehen**, welches der Pull Request zu lösen versucht. Möglicherweise gibt es eine längere Diskussion dazu in einer GitHub-Diskussion oder einem GitHub-Issue.

 * specified the JVM flag {@code -XX:+DisableExplicitGC}. But in practice, it works very well for
 * ordinary tests.
 *
 * <p>Failure of the expected event to occur within an implementation-defined "reasonable" time
 * period or an interrupt while waiting for the expected event will result in a {@link
 * RuntimeException}.
 *
 * <p>Here's an example that tests a {@code finalize} method:
 *
 * <pre>{@code