}
  }

  public static class ImmutableMapEntryListGenerator
      implements TestListGenerator<Entry<String, Integer>> {

    @Override
    public SampleElements<Entry<String, Integer>> samples() {
      return new SampleElements<>(
          mapEntry("foo", 5),
          mapEntry("bar", 3),
          mapEntry("baz", 17),
          mapEntry("quux", 1),
          mapEntry("toaster", -2));
    }

* You can check all the valid Pydantic data types here: <a href="https://docs.pydantic.dev/latest/usage/types/types/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Pydantic data types</a>.

## Example

Here's an example *path operation* with parameters using some of the above types.

//// tab | Python 3.10+

```Python hl_lines="1  3  12-16"
{!> ../../docs_src/extra_data_types/tutorial001_an_py310.py!}
```

////

    open fun encode(codePoint: Int): String {
      throw UnsupportedOperationException()
    }
  }

  enum class Component {
    USER {
      override fun urlString(value: String): String = "http://$value@example.com/"

      override fun encodedValue(url: HttpUrl): String = url.encodedUsername

      override operator fun set(
        builder: HttpUrl.Builder,
        value: String,
      ) {

  /**
   * Returns the {@link InetAddress} having the given string representation.
   *
   * <p>This deliberately avoids all nameservice lookups (e.g. no DNS).
   *
   * <p>This method accepts non-ASCII digits, for example {@code "１９２.１６８.０.１"} (those are fullwidth
   * characters). That is consistent with {@link InetAddress}, but not with various RFCs. If you
   * want to accept ASCII digits only, you can use something like {@code

                </mxCell>
                <mxCell id="29" value="&lt;font face=&quot;Roboto&quot; data-font-src=&quot;https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto&quot; style=&quot;font-size: 24px&quot;&gt;https://someapp.example.com&lt;/font&gt;" style="rounded=0;whiteSpace=wrap;html=1;fontStyle=1;strokeWidth=4;" parent="33" vertex="1">
                    <mxGeometry x="60" y="27" width="380" height="250" as="geometry"/>
                </mxCell>

    }

    @Override
    public TestSubjectGenerator<?> getInnerGenerator() {
      return multimapGenerator;
    }

    @Override
    public SampleElements<Entry<K, V>> samples() {
      return multimapGenerator.samples();
    }

    @Override
    public Collection<Entry<K, V>> create(Object... elements) {
      return multimapGenerator.create(elements).entries();
    }

      this.path = checkNotNull(path);
      this.options = options.clone();
      this.followLinks = followLinks(this.options);
      // TODO(cgdecker): validate the provided options... for example, just WRITE seems wrong
    }

    private static boolean followLinks(OpenOption[] options) {
      for (OpenOption option : options) {
        if (option == NOFOLLOW_LINKS) {
          return false;
        }

      this.path = checkNotNull(path);
      this.options = options.clone();
      this.followLinks = followLinks(this.options);
      // TODO(cgdecker): validate the provided options... for example, just WRITE seems wrong
    }

    private static boolean followLinks(OpenOption[] options) {
      for (OpenOption option : options) {
        if (option == NOFOLLOW_LINKS) {
          return false;
        }

    try (Response response = client.newCall(request).execute()) {
      return response.body().string();
    }
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
    GetExample example = new GetExample();
    String response = example.run("https://raw.github.com/square/okhttp/master/README.md");
    System.out.println(response);
  }

 * but was not itself a public suffix. However, this test is no longer accurate. There are many
 * domains which are both public suffixes and addressable as hosts; {@code "uk.com"} is one example.
 * Using the subset of public suffixes that are {@linkplain #isRegistrySuffix() registry suffixes},
 * one can get a better result, as only a few registry suffixes are addressable. However, the most