if (Constants.TRUE.equalsIgnoreCase(infoMap.get(Constants.CRAWLER_STATUS))) {
                        postcard.setStatus(Constants.OK);
                    } else {
                        postcard.setStatus(Constants.FAIL);
                    }
                    postcard.setJobname(systemProperties.getProperty("job.runtime.name", StringUtil.EMPTY));

    /*
     * These methods "should" call checkNotNull. However, I'm wary of accidentally introducing
     * anything that might slow down execution on such a hot path. Given that the methods are only
     * package-private, I feel OK with just not testing them for NPE.
     *
     * Note that testing casValue is particularly dangerous because it uses Unsafe under some

         * only way to get a TypeVariable instance for the resolved types is to create our own. The
         * created TypeVariable will not interoperate with any JDK TypeVariable. But this is OK: We
         * don't _want_ our new TypeVariable to be equal to the JDK TypeVariable because it has
         * _different bounds_ than the JDK TypeVariable. And it wouldn't make sense for our new

cc.md.us
cc.me.us
cc.mi.us
cc.mn.us
cc.mo.us
cc.ms.us
cc.mt.us
cc.nc.us
cc.nd.us
cc.ne.us
cc.nh.us
cc.nj.us
cc.nm.us
cc.nv.us
cc.ny.us
cc.oh.us
cc.ok.us
cc.or.us
cc.pa.us
cc.pr.us
cc.ri.us
cc.sc.us
cc.sd.us
cc.tn.us
cc.tx.us
cc.ua
cc.ut.us
cc.va.us
cc.vi.us
cc.vt.us
cc.wa.us
cc.wi.us
cc.wv.us

labels.joblog_button_back=返回
labels.joblog_button_delete=刪除
labels.joblog_configuration=作業日誌
labels.joblog_endTime=結束時間
labels.joblog_jobName=名稱
labels.joblog_jobStatus=狀態
labels.joblog_status_ok=OK
labels.joblog_status_fail=失敗
labels.joblog_status_running=執行中
labels.joblog_link_details=詳細資訊
labels.joblog_link_list=列表
labels.joblog_scriptData=腳本
labels.joblog_scriptResult=結果
labels.joblog_scriptType=執行方法

            Response
              .Builder()
              .request(chain!!.request())
              .protocol(Protocol.HTTP_1_1)
              .code(200)
              .message("OK")
              .body("a".toResponseBody(null))
              .build()
          },
        ).build()
    val call = client.newCall(Request.Builder().url(server.url("/")).build())

    for (int64_t i = 0; i < src.NumElements(); ++i) {
      src.flat<tstring>()(i) = data[i];
    }
    TF_Tensor* dst = TF_TensorFromTensor(src, &status);
    ASSERT_TRUE(status.ok()) << status.message();

    // Convert back to a C++ Tensor and ensure we get expected output.
    Tensor output;
    ASSERT_EQ(absl::OkStatus(), TF_TensorToTensor(dst, &output)) << line;

	// Hex constant 0xFFFFFFFE00010001
	ADD $-8589869055, R5            // 3fe0fffe63ff00017bff83e463ff00017cbf2a14 or 0602000138a50001

	//TODO: this compiles to add r5,r6,r0. It should be addi r5,r6,0.
	//      this is OK since r0 == $0, but the latter is preferred.
	ADD $0, R6, R5             	// 7ca60214

        //TODO: the assembler rewrites these into ADDIS $19, R5, Rx and ADD $-10617, Rx, Rx, but the test only sees the first ADDIS

			readers = append(readers, NewDummyDataGen(p, cumulativeSum))
			cumulativeSum += p
		}

		refReader := io.LimitReader(ioutilx.NewSkipReader(io.MultiReader(readers...), off), length)
		if ok, msg := cmpReaders(refReader, rec.Body); !ok {
			t.Fatalf("(%s) Object: %s Case %d ByteRange: %s --> data mismatch! (msg: %s)", instanceType, oi.objectName, i+1, byteRange, msg)
		}
	}

     * value in the map is the number of occurrences of the key.
     */
    SortedMap<Integer, AtomicInteger> replica = Maps.newTreeMap();
    assertTrue("Empty heap should be OK", mmHeap.isIntact());
    for (int i = 0; i < heapSize; i++) {
      int randomInt = random.nextInt();
      mmHeap.offer(randomInt);
      insertIntoReplica(replica, randomInt);
    }
    assertIntact(mmHeap);