wantException bool
}

func TestProxyStatus(t *testing.T) {
	cases := []execTestCase{
		{ // case 0, with no Isitod instance
			args:           []string{},
			noIstiod:       true,
			expectedOutput: "Error: no running Istio pods in \"istio-system\"\n",
			wantException:  true,
		},
		{ // case 1, with Istiod instance
			args:           []string{},

    assertThat(future.set(1)).isTrue();
    assertSuccessful(future, 1);
  }

  public void testFailed() throws Exception {
    Exception cause = new Exception();
    assertThat(future.setException(cause)).isTrue();
    assertFailed(future, cause);
  }

  public void testCanceled() throws Exception {
    assertThat(future.cancel(false /* mayInterruptIfRunning */)).isTrue();
    assertCancelled(future, false);

    }

    /**
     * Test <a href="https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-5568">MNG-5568</a> edge case
     * which was showing transitive inconsistency: since A &gt; B and B &gt; C then we should have A &gt; C
     * otherwise sorting a list of ComparableVersions() will in some cases throw runtime exception;
     * see Netbeans issues <a href="https://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240845">240845</a> and

In the previous example, because the classes were different, we had to use the `response_model` parameter. But that also means that we don't get the support from the editor and tools checking the function return type.

But in most of the cases where we need to do something like this, we want the model just to **filter/remove** some of the data as in this example.

  }

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if {@code iterable} contains any element {@code o} for which {@code
   * Objects.equals(o, element)} would return {@code true}. Otherwise returns {@code false}, even in
   * cases where {@link Collection#contains} might throw {@link NullPointerException} or {@link
   * ClassCastException}.
   */
  // <? extends @Nullable Object> instead of <?> because of Kotlin b/189937072, discussed in Joiner.

		builder.WriteByte('=')
		builder.WriteQuoted(Column{Name: PrimaryKey})
	}
}

// MergeClause merge assignments clauses
func (set Set) MergeClause(clause *Clause) {
	copiedAssignments := make([]Assignment, len(set))
	copy(copiedAssignments, set)
	clause.Expression = Set(copiedAssignments)
}

func Assignments(values map[string]interface{}) Set {
	keys := make([]string, 0, len(values))

	}
}

// MergeClause merge order by clauses
func (returning Returning) MergeClause(clause *Clause) {
	if v, ok := clause.Expression.(Returning); ok {
		returning.Columns = append(v.Columns, returning.Columns...)
	}

	clause.Expression = returning

ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
(INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND
ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS

        return value;
      }
    }
    return null;
  }

  /**
   * A sensible definition of {@link #clear} in terms of the {@code iterator} method of {@link
   * #entrySet}. In many cases, you may wish to override {@link #clear} to forward to this
   * implementation.
   *
   * @since 7.0
   */
  protected void standardClear() {
    Iterators.clear(entrySet().iterator());
  }

  /**

the vast majority of deployments in any negative way.

> Will an upgrade of an existing MinIO cluster impact the SLA of the cluster or will it even cause downtime?

No, an upgrade should not cause any downtime. However, on the first startup -
since MinIO will attempt to migrate any existing IAM data - the boot process may
take slightly longer, but may not be visibly noticeable. Once the migration has