* the behavior of {@link #addAll}, which can lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you should
 * override {@code addAll} as well, either providing your own implementation, or delegating to the
 * provided {@code standardAddAll} method.
 *
 * <p><b>{@code default} method warning:</b> This class does <i>not</i> forward calls to {@code

// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
@IgnoreJRERequirement // We opt into library desugaring for our tests.
public class CollectionRemoveIfTester<E> extends AbstractCollectionTester<E> {
  @CollectionFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_ITERATOR_REMOVE)
  public void testRemoveIf_alwaysFalse() {

// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
@IgnoreJRERequirement // We opt into library desugaring for our tests.
public class MapReplaceTester<K, V> extends AbstractMapTester<K, V> {

  @MapFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_PUT)
  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO)
  public void testReplace_supportedPresent() {
    try {

            } catch (ClassCastException e) {
              return false;
            }
          }

          @Override
          @SuppressWarnings("nullness") // b/192354773 in our checker affects toArray declarations
          public <T extends @Nullable Object> T[] toArray(T[] array) {
            T[] result = super.toArray(array);
            if (size() < result.length) {

// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
@IgnoreJRERequirement // We opt into library desugaring for our tests.
public class CollectionSpliteratorTester<E> extends AbstractCollectionTester<E> {

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = KNOWN_ORDER)
  public void testSpliteratorUnknownOrder() {

   * override subList to return an ImmutableSortedAsList for better performance. Right now, I'm not
   * sure there's any performance hit from our failure to override subListUnchecked under GWT
   */
  @Override
  ImmutableList<E> subListUnchecked(int fromIndex, int toIndex) {
    ImmutableList<E> parentSubList = super.subListUnchecked(fromIndex, toIndex);

    assertThat(converter.reverse().convert(null)).isNull();

    assertEquals((Integer) 5, converter.convert("5"));
    assertThat(converter.reverse().convert(5)).isEqualTo("5");
  }

  // Null-passthrough violates our nullness annotations, so we don't support it under J2KT.
  @J2ktIncompatible
  public void testNullIsPassedThrough() {
    Converter<String, String> nullsArePassed = sillyConverter(false);

        existingValue == null,
        "Duplicate key: (row=%s, column=%s), values: [%s, %s].",
        rowKey,
        columnKey,
        newValue,
        existingValue);
  }

  // redeclare to satisfy our test for b/310253115
  @Override
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible
    abstract Object writeReplace();

public final class EnumBiMap<K extends Enum<K>, V extends Enum<V>> extends AbstractBiMap<K, V> {
  /*
   * J2CL's EnumMap does not need the Class instance, so we can use Object.class instead. (Or we
   * could use null, but that messes with our nullness checking, including under J2KT. We could
   * probably work around it by changing how we annotate the J2CL EnumMap, but that's probably more
   * trouble than just using Object.class.)
   *

public final class EnumBiMap<K extends Enum<K>, V extends Enum<V>> extends AbstractBiMap<K, V> {
  /*
   * J2CL's EnumMap does not need the Class instance, so we can use Object.class instead. (Or we
   * could use null, but that messes with our nullness checking, including under J2KT. We could
   * probably work around it by changing how we annotate the J2CL EnumMap, but that's probably more
   * trouble than just using Object.class.)
   *