<fields>
        <field>
          <name>repository</name>
          <version>4.0.0+</version>
          <description>Information needed to deploy the artifacts generated by the project to a
            remote repository.</description>
          <association>
            <type>DeploymentRepository</type>
          </association>
        </field>

   * These interceptors must call [Interceptor.Chain.proceed] exactly once: it is an error for
   * a network interceptor to short-circuit or repeat a network request.
   */
  @get:JvmName("networkInterceptors")
  val networkInterceptors: List<Interceptor> =
    builder.networkInterceptors.toImmutableList()

  @get:JvmName("eventListenerFactory")

  //    possible to the thing right before the try. You could have
  //    guard.leave(), but that's a little odd as well because the
  //    guard doesn't have anything to do with leaving. You can't
  //    really enforce that the guard you're leaving is the same one
  //    you entered with, and it doesn't actually matter.
  //
  // 2. Since you can enter the monitor without a guard at all, some

            } else if (behavior == 1) { // return null
              computeNullCount.incrementAndGet();
              return null;
            } else if (behavior == 2) { // slight delay before returning
              Thread.sleep(5);
              computeCount.incrementAndGet();
              return key;
            } else {
              computeCount.incrementAndGet();
              return key;

            } else if (behavior == 1) { // return null
              computeNullCount.incrementAndGet();
              return null;
            } else if (behavior == 2) { // slight delay before returning
              Thread.sleep(5);
              computeCount.incrementAndGet();
              return key;
            } else {
              computeCount.incrementAndGet();
              return key;

pkg slices, func Min[$0 interface{ ~[]$1 }, $1 cmp.Ordered]($0) $1 #60091
pkg slices, func MinFunc[$0 interface{ ~[]$1 }, $1 interface{}]($0, func($1, $1) int) $1 #60091
pkg slices, func Replace[$0 interface{ ~[]$1 }, $1 interface{}]($0, int, int, ...$1) $0 #57433
pkg slices, func Reverse[$0 interface{ ~[]$1 }, $1 interface{}]($0) #58565
pkg slices, func Sort[$0 interface{ ~[]$1 }, $1 cmp.Ordered]($0) #60091

  public void testSplitterIterableIsLazy_pattern() {
    if (!CommonPattern.isPcreLike()) {
      return;
    }
    assertSplitterIterableIsLazy(Splitter.onPattern(","));
  }

  /**
   * This test really pushes the boundaries of what we support. In general the splitter's behaviour
   * is not well defined if the char sequence it's splitting is mutated during iteration.
   */

     * @return The resource path.
     */
    public static String getResourcePath(final String className) {
        assertArgumentNotEmpty("className", className);

        return StringUtil.replace(className, ".", "/") + ".class";
    }

    /**
     * Concatenates elements of a class name.
     *
     * @param s1
     *            The first element of the class name
     * @param s2

         * the new one. The result is a ConcurrentModificationException or other bad behavior.
         *
         * (If we decide that we really, really hate allocating two Iterators per cycle instead of
         * one, we can optimistically store the new Iterator and then be willing to throw it out if
         * the user calls remove().)
         */

- [Kubernetes v1.14 Release Notes](#kubernetes-v114-release-notes)
  - [1.14 What’s New](#114-whats-new)
  - [Known Issues](#known-issues-1)
  - [Urgent Upgrade Notes](#urgent-upgrade-notes)
    - [(No, really, you MUST read this before you upgrade)](#no-really-you-must-read-this-before-you-upgrade)
  - [Deprecations](#deprecations)
  - [Removed and deprecated metrics](#removed-and-deprecated-metrics)
    - [Removed metrics](#removed-metrics)