Registry Secret Names */}} {{- define "minio.imagePullSecrets" -}} {{/* Helm 2.11 supports the assignment of a value to a variable defined in a different scope, but Helm 2.9 and 2.10 does not support it, so we need to implement this if-else logic. Also, we can not use a single if because lazy evaluation is not an option */}} {{- if .Values.global }} {{- if .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{- range .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} - name: {{ . }} {{- end }} {{- else if .Val...

Registry Secret Names */}} {{- define "minio.imagePullSecrets" -}} {{/* Helm 2.11 supports the assignment of a value to a variable defined in a different scope, but Helm 2.9 and 2.10 does not support it, so we need to implement this if-else logic. Also, we can not use a single if because lazy evaluation is not an option */}} {{- if .Values.global }} {{- if .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{- range .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} - name: {{ . }} {{- end }} {{- else if .Val...

Registry Secret Names */}} {{- define "minio.imagePullSecrets" -}} {{/* Helm 2.11 supports the assignment of a value to a variable defined in a different scope, but Helm 2.9 and 2.10 does not support it, so we need to implement this if-else logic. Also, we can not use a single if because lazy evaluation is not an option */}} {{- if .Values.global }} {{- if .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{- range .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} - name: {{ . }} {{- end }} {{- else if .Val...

Registry Secret Names */}} {{- define "minio.imagePullSecrets" -}} {{/* Helm 2.11 supports the assignment of a value to a variable defined in a different scope, but Helm 2.9 and 2.10 does not support it, so we need to implement this if-else logic. Also, we can not use a single if because lazy evaluation is not an option */}} {{- if .Values.global }} {{- if .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{- range .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} - name: {{ . }} {{- end }} {{- else if .Val...

   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the argument is not a valid IP string literal
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue // TODO(b/219820829): consider removing
  public static InetAddress forString(String ipString) {
    Scope scope = new Scope();
    byte[] addr = ipStringToBytes(ipString, scope);

    // The argument was malformed, i.e. not an IP string literal.
    if (addr == null) {

     * </ul>
     * Example filter expression: <code>"h(5);s;e(org.foo:bar:1)</code> will cause: ranges are filtered for "top 5" (instead
     * full range), snapshots are banned if root project is not a snapshot, and if range for <code>org.foo:bar</code> is
     * being processed, version 1 is omitted.
     *
     * @since 4.0.0
     */
    @Config

OIDC/OpenID based identity provider environments. This allows the generation of temporary credentials with pre-defined access policies for applications/users to interact with MinIO object storage.

Calling AssumeRoleWithWebIdentity does not require the use of MinIO root or IAM credentials. Therefore, you can distribute an application (for example, on mobile devices) that requests temporary security credentials without including MinIO long lasting credentials in the application. Instead, the identity...

    params {
        // The promotion job doesn't have a branch, so %teamcity.build.branch% doesn't work.
        param("env.BUILD_BRANCH", "%teamcity.build.branch%")
    }

    vcs {
        root(AbsoluteId(VersionedSettingsBranch.fromDslContext().vcsRootId()))
        checkoutMode = CheckoutMode.ON_AGENT
        branchFilter = branchesFilterExcluding()
    }

    features {
        enablePullRequestFeature()

        } else if (project.getModel().getDelegate().isRoot()) {
            throw new IllegalStateException(
                    "The use of the root attribute on the model requires the buildconsumer feature to be active");
        }
    }

    TransformedArtifact createConsumerPomArtifact(

 * good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far from uniform), and
 * amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *
 * <p>Unlike {@code java.util.HashSet}, iteration is only proportional to the actual {@code size()},
 * which is optimal, and <i>not</i> the size of the internal hashtable, which could be much larger