FileSystemInformation.FS_FULL_SIZE_INFO })
    void testConstructorWithDifferentInformationLevels(int informationLevel) {
        // Test constructor with different information levels
        response = new Trans2QueryFSInformationResponse(config, informationLevel);

        assertNotNull(response);
        assertEquals(informationLevel, response.getInformationLevel());

                Configuration passed to Pydantic to define if the response data
                should have all the fields, including the ones that were not set and
                have their default values. This is different from
                `response_model_exclude_defaults` in that if the fields are set,
                they will be included in the response, even if the value is the same
                as the default.

 */
class CipherSuite private constructor(
  /**
   * Returns the Java name of this cipher suite. For some older cipher suites the Java name has the
   * prefix `SSL_`, causing the Java name to be different from the instance name which is always
   * prefixed `TLS_`. For example, `TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC4_40_MD5.javaName()` is
   * `"SSL_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC4_40_MD5"`.
   */
  @get:JvmName("javaName") val javaName: String,
) {

        Artifact nonLocalReposioryArtifact = mock(Artifact.class);
        when(nonLocalReposioryArtifact.getFile()).thenReturn(new File("something/completely/different"));

        assertTrue(ReverseTreeRepositoryListener.isLocalRepositoryArtifactOrMissing(session, localRepositoryArtifact));
        assertFalse(

// compression and checksumming which currently necessitates mutating data in
// the kernel.
//
// DirectIO semantics for a filesystem like ZFS would be quite different than
// the semantics on filesystems like XFS, and these semantics are not
// implemented at this time.
// For more information on why typical DirectIO semantics do not apply to ZFS
// see this ZFS-on-Linux commit message:

 *
 *
 * A context holds the client configuration, shared services as well as the active credentials.
 *
 * Usually you will want to create one context per client configuration and then
 * multiple sub-contexts using different credentials (if necessary).
 *
 * {@link #withDefaultCredentials()}, {@link #withAnonymousCredentials()}, {@link #withCredentials(Credentials)}
 * allow to create such sub-contexts.
 *
 *

  DefaultExpressionEvaluator used within. See the above discussion for more
  on why this evaluator is bad. We need to provide either an alternative
  implementation under a different roleHint, or else replace the
  BasicComponentConfigurator.

* Other

  We may need to define a new lifecycle/phase to contextualize a mojo right

## Tests de performance et rapidité

Lorsque vous vérifiez les tests de performance, il est commun de voir plusieurs outils de différents types comparés comme équivalents.

En particulier, on voit Uvicorn, Starlette et FastAPI comparés (parmi de nombreux autres outils).

  }

  @Override
  public final boolean equals(@Nullable Object obj) {
    if (obj instanceof Subscriber) {
      Subscriber that = (Subscriber) obj;
      // Use == so that different equal instances will still receive events.
      // We only guard against the case that the same object is registered
      // multiple times
      return target == that.target && method.equals(that.method);
    }

		if claims.AccessKey != globalActiveCred.AccessKey {
			u, ok := globalIAMSys.GetUser(req.Context(), claims.AccessKey)
			if !ok {
				// Credentials will be invalid but for disabled
				// return a different error in such a scenario.
				if u.Credentials.Status == auth.AccountOff {
					return nil, errAccessKeyDisabled
				}
				return nil, errInvalidAccessKeyID
			}
			cred := u.Credentials