*       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

            assertTrue(jcifs.Decodable.class.isAssignableFrom(AllocInfo.class));
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should define getCapacity method")
        void shouldDefineGetCapacityMethod() throws NoSuchMethodException {
            // Verify method exists with correct signature
            assertNotNull(AllocInfo.class.getMethod("getCapacity"));

import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;

/**
 * Tests for the NetShareEnumResponse class.
 */
class NetShareEnumResponseTest {

    /**
     * Tests the readParametersWireFormat method.
     */
    @Test
    void testReadParametersWireFormat() {
        NetShareEnumResponse response = new NetShareEnumResponse();

   * ordering of the keys.
   *
   * <p>Despite the method name, this method attempts to avoid actually copying the data when it is
   * safe to do so. The exact circumstances under which a copy will or will not be performed are
   * undocumented and subject to change.
   *
   * <p>This method is not type-safe, as it may be called on a map with keys that are not mutually
   * comparable.
   *

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

        assertNotNull(result);

        // Note: Actual log output verification would require a log appender mock
        // but we can at least ensure the method executes without errors
        logger.info("Execute method called with query: {} and boost: {}", query, boost);
    }

    @Test
    public void test_execute_withHighBoost() {
        // Test execute with high boost value