// Assert
        assertNotNull(handle);
        verify(mockDcerpcHandle, times(1)).sendrecv(any(MsrpcLsarOpenPolicy2.class));
        // Further verification could involve capturing the MsrpcLsarOpenPolicy2 argument and checking its server field.
    }

    @Test
    void constructor_shouldThrowSmbExceptionOnRpcError() throws IOException {
        // Arrange

            if (rootProjectPom == null) {
                LOGGER.info(
                        "Maven detected that the requested POM file is part of a multi-module project, "
                                + "but could not find a pom.xml file in the root directory '{}'.",
                        rootDirectory);
                LOGGER.info(
                        "The reactor is limited to all projects under: {}",

                                    writer.write(line);
                                }
                            } catch (final Exception e) {
                                logger.warn("Could not read " + (tempFile != null ? tempFile.getAbsolutePath() : "a byte stream"), e);
                            } finally {
                                CloseableUtil.closeQuietly(br);
                            }

	return "Invalid upload id " + e.UploadID
}

// InvalidPart One or more of the specified parts could not be found
type InvalidPart struct {
	PartNumber int
	ExpETag    string
	GotETag    string
}

func (e InvalidPart) Error() string {
	return fmt.Sprintf("Specified part could not be found. PartNumber %d, Expected %s, got %s",
		e.PartNumber, e.ExpETag, e.GotETag)
}

            //
            // If we were to cancel taskFuture, that would let the next task start while the old
            // one is still running.
            //
            // Now, maybe we could tweak our implementation to not start the next task until the
            // callable actually completes. (We could detect completion in our wrapper
            // `AsyncCallable task`.) However, our contract also promises:

echo JAVA_HOME points to an invalid Java installation (no java.exe found in "%JAVA_HOME%"^). Exiting...
goto:eof
)

"%JAVA_HOME%\bin\java" -Xmx50M -version > nul 2>&1

if errorlevel 1 (
	echo Warning: Could not start JVM to detect version, defaulting to x86:
	goto x86
)

"%JAVA_HOME%\bin\java" -Xmx50M -version 2>&1 | "%windir%\System32\find" "64-Bit" >nul:

if errorlevel 1 goto x86

   * {@link PermittedMetaException} instances, which wrap a set of all exceptions that the iterator
   * could throw during the invocation of that method. This is necessary because, e.g., a call to
   * {@code iterator().remove()} of an unmodifiable list could throw either {@link
   * IllegalStateException} or {@link UnsupportedOperationException}. Note that iterator

- Fix a bug that Pods could stuck in the unschedulable pod pool 
  if they're rejected by PreEnqueue plugins that could change its result by a change in resources apart from Pods.
  
  DRA plugin is the only plugin that meets the criteria of the bug in in-tree, 
  and hence if you have `DynamicResourceAllocation` feature flag enabled, 

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

    // in the opposite order from how they were added so we need to reverse the list to fulfill our
    // contract.
    // This is somewhat annoying, but turns out to be very fast in practice. Alternatively, we could
    // drop the contract on the method that enforces this queue like behavior since depending on it
    // is likely to be a bug anyway.