* Następnie dodaj **komentarz** z informacją o tym, że sprawdziłeś kod, dzięki temu będę miał pewność, że faktycznie go sprawdziłeś.

/// info

Niestety, nie mogę ślepo ufać PR-om, nawet jeśli mają kilka zatwierdzeń.

            .build();

    RangeMap<Integer, Integer> copy = TreeRangeMap.copyOf(rangeMap);

    assertEquals(rangeMap.asMapOfRanges(), copy.asMapOfRanges());
  }

  // Overriding testEquals because it seems that we get spurious failures when it things empty
  // should be unequal to empty.
  public void testEquals() {
    TreeRangeMap<Integer, Integer> empty = TreeRangeMap.create();

// updates rebalance.bin from let's say 2 pool setup in the middle
// of a rebalance, was expanded can cause z.rebalMeta to be outdated
// due to a missing new pool. This function tries to handle this
// scenario, albeit rare it seems to have occurred in the wild.
//
// since we do not explicitly disallow it, but it is okay for them
// expand and then we continue to rebalance.
func (z *erasureServerPools) updateRebalanceStats(ctx context.Context) error {

   * values.length) are all {@code null}.
   */
  @VisibleForTesting transient @Nullable Object @Nullable [] values;

  /**
   * Keeps track of metadata like the number of hash table bits and modifications of this data
   * structure (to make it possible to throw ConcurrentModificationException in the iterator). Note

      totalCount += count;
      return this;
    }

    AvlNode<E> add(
        Comparator<? super E> comparator, @ParametricNullness E e, int count, int[] result) {
      /*
       * It speeds things up considerably to unconditionally add count to totalCount here,
       * but that destroys failure atomicity in the case of count overflow. =(
       */
      int cmp = comparator.compare(e, getElement());

		if cr.debug {
			fmt.Printf("prefix, want prefix %q, got %q", "x-amz-trailer-signature:", string(sig))
		}
		return errMalformedEncoding
	}

	// TODO: It seems like we may have to be prepared to rewrite and sort trailing headers:
	// https://docs.aws.amazon.com/IAM/latest/UserGuide/create-signed-request.html

	// Any value must end with a newline.
	// Not all clients send that.

Those two tasks are what **consume time the most**. That's the main work of maintaining FastAPI.

If you can help me with that, **you are helping me maintain FastAPI** and making sure it keeps **advancing faster and better**. 🚀

## Join the chat { #join-the-chat }

ight,.fab.fa-pull-right,.fal.fa-pull-right,.far.fa-pull-right,.fas.fa-pull-right{margin-left:.3em}.fa-spin{-webkit-animation:fa-spin 2s linear infinite;animation:fa-spin 2s linear infinite}.fa-pulse{-webkit-animation:fa-spin 1s steps(8) infinite;animation:fa-spin 1s steps(8) infinite}@-webkit-keyframes fa-spin{0%{-webkit-transform:rotate(0deg);transform:rotate(0deg)}to{-webkit-transform:rotate(1turn);transform:rotate(1turn)}}@keyframes fa-spin{0%{-webkit-transform:rotate(0deg);transform:rotate(0...

 *
 * <p><a id="iteration"></a>
 *
 * <p><b>Key-grouped iteration.</b> All view collections follow the same iteration order. In all
 * current implementations, the iteration order always keeps multiple entries with the same key
 * together. Any creation method that would customarily respect insertion order (such as {@link
 * #copyOf(Multimap)}) instead preserves key-grouped order by inserting entries for an existing key

		// no action. Thus, we try an innocent seek to the current position
		// to see if Seek is really supported.
		pos1, err := sr.Seek(0, io.SeekCurrent)
		if pos1 >= 0 && err == nil {
			// Seek seems supported, so perform the real Seek.
			pos2, err := sr.Seek(n-1, io.SeekCurrent)
			if pos2 < 0 || err != nil {
				return err
			}
			seekSkipped = pos2 - pos1
		}
	}