return backingCollection;
    }

    @Override
    public boolean addAll(Collection<? extends T> collection) {
      return standardAddAll(collection);
    }

    @Override
    public void clear() {
      standardClear();
    }

    @Override
    public boolean contains(Object object) {
      return standardContains(object);
    }

    @Override

      return backingQueue;
    }

    @Override
    public boolean addAll(Collection<? extends T> collection) {
      return standardAddAll(collection);
    }

    @Override
    public void clear() {
      standardClear();
    }

    @Override
    public boolean contains(Object object) {
      return standardContains(object);
    }

    @Override

Você pode configurar alguns [parâmetros extras da UI do Swagger](https://swagger.io/docs/open-source-tools/swagger-ui/usage/configuration/).

Para configurá-los, passe o argumento `swagger_ui_parameters` ao criar o objeto da aplicação `FastAPI()` ou para a função `get_swagger_ui_html()`.

`swagger_ui_parameters` recebe um dicionário com as configurações passadas diretamente para o Swagger UI.

   *
   * <p>This is equivalent to {@code remove(Range.all())}.
   *
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException if this range set does not support the {@code clear}
   *     operation
   */
  void clear();

  /**
   * Adds all of the ranges from the specified range set to this range set (optional operation).
   * After this operation, this range set is the minimal range set that {@linkplain

        
        if (response.isSuccess()) {
            parseNetworkInterfaces(response.getOutputData());
        }
    }
    
    private void parseNetworkInterfaces(byte[] data) {
        remoteInterfaces.clear();
        int offset = 0;
        
        while (offset < data.length) {
            // Parse NETWORK_INTERFACE_INFO structure
            int next = readInt4(data, offset);

 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could
 * support even a "normal" `TypeParameter<T>` when `<T>` has a nullable bound. (See the discussion
 * on TypeToken.where.) So, in the interest of failing fast and encouraging the user to switch to a

namespace tensorflow {

class ImmediateExecutionContext;
class AbstractOpAttrs;

// Abstract interface to an operation.
class ImmediateExecutionOperation : public AbstractOperation {
 public:
  virtual void Clear() = 0;

  // Returns the inputs of this op.
  virtual absl::Span<ImmediateExecutionTensorHandle* const> GetInputs()
      const = 0;
  virtual absl::Status SetInput(size_t index,

fonctionnalités couvertes par **FastAPI** en utilisant de nombreux frameworks, plug-ins et outils différents.

Mais à un moment donné il n'y avait pas d'autre option que de créer quelque chose qui offrait toutes ces
fonctionnalités, en reprenant et en combinant de la meilleure façon possible les meilleures idées des outils

    // Set<Object> keys = map.keySet();
    // assertThat(keys).containsExactly(one, three);
    // Collection<Object> values = map.values();
    // assertThat(values).containsExactly(one, two);

    map.clear();

    assertThat(cache.stats()).isEqualTo(EMPTY_STATS);
  }

  public void testNoStats() {
    CacheBuilder<Object, Object> builder =
        CacheBuilder.newBuilder().concurrencyLevel(1).maximumSize(2);

    // Set<Object> keys = map.keySet();
    // assertThat(keys).containsExactly(one, three);
    // Collection<Object> values = map.values();
    // assertThat(values).containsExactly(one, two);

    map.clear();

    assertThat(cache.stats()).isEqualTo(EMPTY_STATS);
  }

  public void testNoStats() {
    CacheBuilder<Object, Object> builder =
        CacheBuilder.newBuilder().concurrencyLevel(1).maximumSize(2);