</p>

<pre>
switch tag {
default: s3()
case 0, 1, 2, 3: s1()
case 4, 5, 6, 7: s2()
}

switch x := f(); {  // missing switch expression means "true"
case x &lt; 0: return -x
default: return x
}

switch {
case x &lt; y: f1()
case x &lt; z: f2()
case x == 4: f3()
}
</pre>

<p>

   *
   * The connection is implicit, and will generally relate to the last [connectionAcquired] event.
   *
   * This will usually be invoked only 1 time for a single [Call], exceptions are a limited set of
   * cases including failure recovery.
   *
   * Prior to OkHttp 4.3 this was incorrectly invoked when the client was ready to read the response
   * body. This was misleading for tracing because it was too early.
   */

   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@code string.toUpperCase().equals("UPPER CASE ASCII")}
   *   <li>{@code string.toLowerCase().equals("lower case ascii")}
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>due to case-folding of some non-ASCII characters (which does not occur in {@link
   * String#equalsIgnoreCase}). However in almost all cases that ASCII strings are used, the author

    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      return "IsOdd";
    }
  }

  /**
   * Generates a new Predicate per call.
   *
   * <p>Creating a new Predicate each time helps catch cases where code is using {@code x == y}
   * instead of {@code x.equals(y)}.
   */
  private static IsOdd isOdd() {
    return new IsOdd();
  }

  /*
   * Tests for Predicates.alwaysTrue().
   */

          }
        }
      }
    }
  }

  @AndroidIncompatible // slow
  @GwtIncompatible // Doubles.tryParse
  public void testTryParseAllCodePoints() {
    // Exercise non-ASCII digit test cases and the like.
    char[] tmp = new char[2];
    for (int i = Character.MIN_CODE_POINT; i < Character.MAX_CODE_POINT; i++) {
      Character.toChars(i, tmp, 0);

This can save everyone a lot of time and frustration.

For any non-trivial change, we need to be able to answer these questions:

* Why is this change done? What's the use case?
* For user-facing features, what will the API look like?
* What test cases should it have? What could go wrong?

## Highlights

- Supports source and destination buckets to have the same name unlike AWS S3, addresses variety of use-cases such as *Splunk*, *Veeam* site to site DR.
- Supports object locking/retention across source and destination buckets natively out of the box, unlike AWS S3.

         * behavior on all platforms, TypeResolver must return the appropriate TypeVariable
         * implementation in each of the three possible cases:
         *
         * 1. Under Android, the built-in TypeVariable implementation interoperates with ours.
         * Therefore, we can always create our own TypeVariable. (One downside of our TypeVariable

            assertNotNull(result.getServer());
            // Empty components between double backslashes are handled
        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Edge Cases and Boundary Tests")
    class EdgeCasesTests {

        @ParameterizedTest
        @NullAndEmptySource
        @DisplayName("Should handle null and empty domains")

///

All the documentation is in Markdown format in the directory `./docs/en/`.

Many of the tutorials have blocks of code.

In most of the cases, these blocks of code are actual complete applications that can be run as is.

In fact, those blocks of code are not written inside the Markdown, they are Python files in the `./docs_src/` directory.