*/
    long deadline = System.nanoTime() + unit.toNanos(timeout);
    int added = 0;
    while (added < numElements) {
      // we could rely solely on #poll, but #drainTo might be more efficient when there are multiple
      // elements already available (e.g. LinkedBlockingQueue#drainTo locks only once)
      added += q.drainTo(buffer, numElements - added);

     */
    long deadline = System.nanoTime() + unit.toNanos(timeout);
    int added = 0;
    while (added < numElements) {
      // we could rely solely on #poll, but #drainTo might be more efficient when there are multiple
      // elements already available (e.g. LinkedBlockingQueue#drainTo locks only once)
      added += q.drainTo(buffer, numElements - added);

  * Note that because any taints you might have created with Kubernetes 1.5 can only affect the scheduling of new pods (the `NoExecute` taint effect is introduced in 1.6), neither the master upgrade nor your running `kubectl taint` to re-create the taints will affect pods that are already running....

              "options": "S3 Errors"
            },
            "properties": [
              {
                "id": "color",
                "value": {
                  "fixedColor": "light-red",
                  "mode": "fixed"
                }
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "matcher": {
              "id": "byName",

              "options": "Replication Errors"
            },
            "properties": [
              {
                "id": "color",
                "value": {
                  "fixedColor": "light-red",
                  "mode": "fixed"
                }
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "matcher": {
              "id": "byName",

              "options": "Replication Errors"
            },
            "properties": [
              {
                "id": "color",
                "value": {
                  "fixedColor": "light-red",
                  "mode": "fixed"
                }
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "matcher": {
              "id": "byName",

## Overriding dependencies during testing { #overriding-dependencies-during-testing }

There are some scenarios where you might want to override a dependency during testing.

You don't want the original dependency to run (nor any of the sub-dependencies it might have).

### Bug or Regression

 */
/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could
 * support even a "normal" `TypeParameter<T>` when `<T>` has a nullable bound. (See the discussion

    eventSource: EventSource,
    response: Response,
  ) {
  }

  /**
   * Invoked when a new event has been sent to the client.
   *
   * @param id The `id` line of the event, might be null.
   * @param type The `event` line of the event, might be null.
   * @param data The `data` line of the event.
   */
  open fun onEvent(
    eventSource: EventSource,
    id: String?,
    type: String?,
    data: String,
  ) {
  }