* invokeAny} which are pending serial execution, even the subset of the tasks that have not yet
   * started execution. It is unclear from the {@code ExecutorService} specification if these should
   * be included, and it's much easier to implement the interpretation that they not be. Finally, a
   * call to {@code shutdown} or {@code shutdownNow} may result in concurrent calls to {@code

</blockquote>

## Investigation

Durch die Nutzung all dieser vorherigen Alternativen hatte ich die Möglichkeit, von allen zu lernen, Ideen aufzunehmen und sie auf die beste Weise zu kombinieren, die ich für mich und die Entwicklerteams, mit denen ich zusammengearbeitet habe, finden konnte.

Es war beispielsweise klar, dass es idealerweise auf Standard-Python-Typhinweisen basieren sollte.

</dependencies>
    ]]></configuration>
    <description>
      <![CDATA[
      This is a set of Artifact instances resolved from the set of dependencies for
      the current project.

      NOTE: This will likely contain much more than the direct dependencies of the
      current POM, since Maven uses transitive, or chained, dependency resolution.
    ]]></description>
  </expression>
  <expression>
    <syntax>project.parentArtifact</syntax>

---

If you just don't know, use normal `def`.

---

**Note**: You can mix `def` and `async def` in your *path operation functions* as much as you need and define each one using the best option for you. FastAPI will do the right thing with them.

Anyway, in any of the cases above, FastAPI will still work asynchronously and be extremely fast.

Import the `Response` class (sub-class) you want to use and declare it in the *path operation decorator*.

For large responses, returning a `Response` directly is much faster than returning a dictionary.

Your server(s) is (are) a **resource**, you can consume or **utilize**, with your programs, the computation time on the CPUs, and the RAM memory available.

How much of the system resources do you want to be consuming/utilizing? It might be easy to think "not much", but in reality, you will probably want to consume **as much as possible without crashing**.

      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.
      throw new TimeoutException("Timed out waiting for " + this + " to reach the RUNNING state.");
    }
  }

  @Override

            assertTrue(scheduler.containsKey("running"));
            isRunning = (Boolean) scheduler.get("running");

        }
        if (300 <= count) {
            logger.info("Time out: Crawler takes too much time");
            //TODO fail(); // Time Out
        }

        logger.info("Crawler terminated");
    }

    protected static String createWebConfig(final Map<String, Object> requestBody) {

   * invokeAny} which are pending serial execution, even the subset of the tasks that have not yet
   * started execution. It is unclear from the {@code ExecutorService} specification if these should
   * be included, and it's much easier to implement the interpretation that they not be. Finally, a
   * call to {@code shutdown} or {@code shutdownNow} may result in concurrent calls to {@code

import java.math.BigInteger;
import java.util.Random;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Utilities for benchmarks.
 *
 * <p>In many cases, we wish to vary the order of magnitude of the input as much as we want to vary
 * the input itself, so most methods which generate values use an exponential distribution varying
 * the order of magnitude of the generated values uniformly at random.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */