assertEquals(SmbComTransaction.TRANS_WAIT_NAMED_PIPE, transWaitNamedPipe.getSubCommand());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Multiple wire format operations should be consistent")
    void testMultipleWireFormatOperations() {
        // Arrange
        transWaitNamedPipe = new TransWaitNamedPipe(mockConfig, testPipeName);
        byte[] dst1 = new byte[10];
        byte[] dst2 = new byte[10];

   * without grabbing the lock.
   *
   * <p>To update this field correctly the lock must be held to guarantee that the state is
   * consistent.
   */
  private volatile StateSnapshot snapshot = new StateSnapshot(NEW);

  /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
  protected AbstractService() {}

  /**

        @Test
        @DisplayName("getOpnum should be consistent across multiple calls")
        void testGetOpnumConsistency() {
            // When
            int opnum1 = bind.getOpnum();
            int opnum2 = bind.getOpnum();
            int opnum3 = bind.getOpnum();

            // Then
            assertEquals(opnum1, opnum2, "Opnum should be consistent");

      assertTrue(item + " must be equivalent to itself", equivalence.equivalent(item, item));
      assertEquals(
          "the hash of " + item + " must be consistent",
          equivalence.hash(item),
          equivalence.hash(item));
    }
  }

-   Ensure you have signed the
    [Contributor License Agreement (CLA)](https://cla.developers.google.com/).
-   Check if your changes are consistent with the
    [guidelines](#general-guidelines-and-philosophy-for-contribution).
-   Changes are consistent with the [Coding Style](#c-coding-style).
-   Run the [unit tests](#running-unit-tests).

## How to become a contributor and submit your own code

        // Then
        assertEquals(0, bytesRead);
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @ValueSource(ints = { 0, 10, 50, 100, 200 })
    @DisplayName("Should write consistent structure at different offsets")
    void testWriteBytesAtDifferentOffsets(int offset) {
        // Given
        Configuration mockConfig = mock(Configuration.class);

   *       traffic to {@code charlie}, rather than letting {@code bravo} keep its traffic.
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>See the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consistent_hashing">Wikipedia article on
   * consistent hashing</a> for more information.
   */
  public static int consistentHash(HashCode hashCode, int buckets) {
    return consistentHash(hashCode.padToLong(), buckets);
  }

  /**

		wantOk       bool
	}{
		{
			name:         "consistent",
			m:            metaCacheEntries{inputSerialized[0], inputSerialized[0], inputSerialized[0], inputSerialized[0]},
			r:            metadataResolutionParams{dirQuorum: 4, objQuorum: 4, strict: false},
			wantSelected: &inputSerialized[0],
			wantOk:       true,
		},
		{
			name:         "consistent-strict",

            // from being reused. Otherwise we're still obligated to transmit the request body to
            // leave the connection in a consistent state.
            exchange.noNewExchangesOnConnection()
          }
        }
      } else if (!isUpgradeRequest) {
        exchange.noRequestBody()
      }

But now that FastAPI 0.99.0 and above uses OpenAPI 3.1.0, that uses JSON Schema 2020-12, and Swagger UI 5.0.0 and above, everything is more consistent and the examples are included in JSON Schema.

### Swagger UI and OpenAPI-specific `examples` { #swagger-ui-and-openapi-specific-examples }