Item<T> relatedInfo = getItem(groupNumber, relatedItemNumber);

    T item = itemInfo.value;
    T related = relatedInfo.value;
    assertWithTemplate(
        "$ITEM must be $RELATIONSHIP to $OTHER",
        itemInfo,
        relatedInfo,
        equivalence.equivalent(item, related));

    int itemHash = equivalence.hash(item);
    int relatedHash = equivalence.hash(related);

// Namer namer interface
type Namer interface {
	TableName(table string) string
	SchemaName(table string) string
	ColumnName(table, column string) string
	JoinTableName(joinTable string) string
	RelationshipFKName(Relationship) string
	CheckerName(table, column string) string
	IndexName(table, column string) string
	UniqueName(table, column string) string
}

// Replacer replacer interface like strings.Replacer
type Replacer interface {

Otherwise, type inference fails and the program is invalid.
</p>

<p>
Type inference uses the type relationships between pairs of types for inference:
For instance, a function argument must be <a href="#Assignability">assignable</a>
to its respective function parameter; this establishes a relationship between the
type of the argument and the type of the parameter.

   *
   * @since 8.0
   */
  public static final byte ESC = 27;

  /**
   * File Separator: These four information separators may be used within data in optional fashion,
   * except that their hierarchical relationship shall be: FS is the most inclusive, then GS, then
   * RS, and US is least inclusive. (The content and length of a File, Group, Record, or Unit are
   * not specified.)
   *
   * @since 8.0
   */

        // Arrange: any implementation of SmbRenewableCredentials must satisfy CredentialsInternal
        SmbRenewableCredentials impl = new SelfRenewingCreds();

        // Assert: the extended interface relationship holds
        assertTrue(impl instanceof CredentialsInternal, "Should be usable as CredentialsInternal");

        // Cast and check we can call clone() from CredentialsInternal contract

     * <p>
     * The returned instant is calculated by adding the elapsed nanoseconds
     * since clock creation to the initial wall clock time. This ensures that
     * the time never goes backwards and maintains a consistent relationship
     * with the wall clock time.
     *
     * @return the current instant using monotonic timing
     */
    @Override
    public Instant instant() {

	}
	return reflect.StructTag(fmt.Sprintf(`gorm:"%s;%s"`, value, t))
}

// GetRelationsValues get relations's values from a reflect value
func GetRelationsValues(ctx context.Context, reflectValue reflect.Value, rels []*Relationship) (reflectResults reflect.Value) {
	for _, rel := range rels {
		reflectResults = reflect.MakeSlice(reflect.SliceOf(reflect.PointerTo(rel.FieldSchema.ModelType)), 0, 1)

		appendToResults := func(value reflect.Value) {

     */
    public DictionaryManager() {
        // Default constructor
    }

    /**
     * Initializes the dictionary manager after construction.
     * Sets up the relationship between this manager and all registered creators.
     */
    @PostConstruct
    public void init() {
        if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
            logger.debug("Initializing {}", this.getClass().getSimpleName());

     */
    // MAVENAPI FIXME: the DAG used is NOT only used to represent the dependency relation,
    // but also for <parent>, <build><plugin>, <reports>. We need multiple DAG's
    // since a DAG can only handle 1 type of relationship properly.
    // Use case:  This is detected as a cycle:
    // org.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api                -(PARENT)->
    // org.apache.maven:maven                           -(inherited REPORTING)->

Also, the best approach was to use already existing standards.

So, before even starting to code **FastAPI**, I spent several months studying the specs for OpenAPI, JSON Schema, OAuth2, etc. Understanding their relationship, overlap, and differences.

## Design { #design }

Then I spent some time designing the developer "API" I wanted to have as a user (as a developer using FastAPI).