/**
   * Asserts that {@code transformation} is diagonal (i.e. neither horizontal nor vertical) and
   * passes through both {@code (x1, y1)} and {@code (x1 + xDelta, y1 + yDelta)}. Includes
   * assertions about all the public instance methods of {@link LinearTransformation} (on both
   * {@code transformation} and its inverse). Since the transformation is expected to be diagonal,
   * neither {@code xDelta} nor {@code yDelta} may be zero.
   */

  ) {
  }

  /**
   * Invoked prior to a proxy selection.
   *
   * This will be invoked for route selection regardless of whether the client
   * is configured with a single proxy, a proxy selector, or neither.
   *
   * @param url a URL with only the scheme, hostname, and port specified.
   */
  open fun proxySelectStart(
    call: Call,
    url: HttpUrl,
  ) {
  }

  /**

    return new TreeMultimap<>(Ordering.natural(), Ordering.natural());
  }

  /**
   * Creates an empty {@code TreeMultimap} instance using explicit comparators. Neither comparator
   * may be null; use {@link Ordering#natural()} to specify natural order.
   *
   * @param keyComparator the comparator that determines the key ordering

    SmbFileHandleImpl fileHandle;

    @Mock
    Configuration config;

    private SmbPipeHandleImpl target;

    @BeforeEach
    void setUp() throws SmbException {
        // Default pipe characteristics: neither transact nor call; RDWR for access
        when(pipe.getPipeType()).thenReturn(SmbPipeResource.PIPE_TYPE_RDWR);
        when(pipe.getUncPath()).thenReturn("\\\\pipe\\\\my-pipe");

        // Setup tree with configuration

 *   <li>(1) "yes" and (2) "yes", use {@link #forTree(SuccessorsFunction)}.
 *   <li>(1) "yes" and (2) "no", you can use either, but {@code forTree()} will be more efficient.
 *   <li>(1) "no" and (2) "yes", <b><i>neither will work</i></b>, but if you transform your node
 *       objects into a non-recursive form, you can use {@code forGraph()}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * @author Jens Nyman

   *
   * @deprecated If you must interoperate with a system that requires MD5, then use this method,
   *     despite its deprecation. But if you can choose your hash function, avoid MD5, which is
   *     neither fast nor secure. As of January 2017, we suggest:
   *     <ul>
   *       <li>For security:
   *           {@link Hashing#sha256} or a higher-level API.

   * assume that using setCount() to increase the count is permitted iff add()
   * is permitted and similarly for decrease/remove(). We assume that a
   * setCount() no-op is permitted if either add() or remove() is permitted,
   * though we also allow it to "succeed" if neither is permitted.
   */

  private void assertSetCount(E element, int count) {
    setCountCheckReturnValue(element, count);

    assertEquals(

  }

  @Override
  public void clear() {
    if (needsAllocArrays()) {
      return;
    }
    this.firstEntry = ENDPOINT;
    this.lastEntry = ENDPOINT;
    // Either both arrays are null or neither is, but we check both to satisfy the nullness checker.
    if (predecessor != null && successor != null) {
      Arrays.fill(predecessor, 0, size(), 0);
      Arrays.fill(successor, 0, size(), 0);
    }

  }

  @Override
  public void clear() {
    if (needsAllocArrays()) {
      return;
    }
    this.firstEntry = ENDPOINT;
    this.lastEntry = ENDPOINT;
    // Either both arrays are null or neither is, but we check both to satisfy the nullness checker.
    if (predecessor != null && successor != null) {
      Arrays.fill(predecessor, 0, size(), 0);
      Arrays.fill(successor, 0, size(), 0);
    }

    final Converter<A, B> original;

    ReverseConverter(Converter<A, B> original) {
      this.original = original;
    }

    /*
     * These gymnastics are a little confusing. Basically this class has neither legacy nor
     * non-legacy behavior; it just needs to let the behavior of the backing converter shine
     * through. So, we override the correctedDo* methods, after which the do* methods should never
     * be reached.