@GwtCompatible
final class SortedLists {
  private SortedLists() {}

  /**
   * A specification for which index to return if the list contains at least one element that
   * compares as equal to the key.
   */
  enum KeyPresentBehavior {
    /**
     * Return the index of any list element that compares as equal to the key. No guarantees are
     * made as to which index is returned, if more than one element compares as equal to the key.
     */

        assertFalse(validator.isValid("* * * *", context));
    }

    // Test common valid cron patterns that are likely to work
    public void test_basicValidCronExpressions() {
        final ConstraintValidatorContext context = null;

        // Test basic patterns that should be valid
        String[] potentiallyValidCrons = { "0 0 * * * ?", // Every hour
                "0 */15 * * * ?", // Every 15 minutes

   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getAddNullSupportedMethod() {

   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getAddNullSupportedMethod() {

    /*
     * The entrySet() of ConcurrentHashMap, unlike that of other Map
     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users

@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class AbstractListTester<E extends @Nullable Object> extends AbstractCollectionTester<E> {
  /*
   * Previously we had a field named list that was initialized to the value of
   * collection in setUp(), but that caused problems when a tester changed the
   * value of list or collection but not both.
   */
  protected final List<E> getList() {
    return (List<E>) collection;
  }

  /**

  })
  private void waitForInterrupt(Thread currentThread) {
    /*
     * If someone called cancel(true), it is possible that the interrupted bit hasn't been set yet.
     * Wait for the interrupting thread to set DONE. (See interruptTask().) We want to wait so that
     * the interrupting thread doesn't interrupt the _next_ thing to run on this thread.
     *

   * absent, it will fall back to a heavyweight operation that will open a stream, read (or {@link
   * InputStream#skip(long) skip}, if possible) to the end of the stream and return the total number
   * of bytes that were read.
   *
   * <p>Note that for some sources that implement {@link #sizeIfKnown} to provide a more efficient
   * implementation, it is <i>possible</i> that this method will return a different number of bytes

 * want their output to be non-null in operations like `stream.map(myConverter)`, and we can
 * guarantee that as long as we also require the input type to be non-null[*] (which is a
 * requirement that existing callers already fulfill).
 *
 * Disclaimer: Part of the reason that callers are so well adapted to `Function<A, B>` may be that
 * that is how the signature looked even prior to this comment! So naturally any change can break

        // Test that custom sessionId is sanitized
        Crawler.Options options = new Crawler.Options();
        options.sessionId = "test-session-123";

        // Simulate what process() does - sanitize sessionId
        if (options.sessionId != null) {
            options.sessionId = options.sessionId.replaceAll("-", "_");
        }