return set1.contains(element) ^ set2.contains(element);
      }

      @Override
      int minSize() {
        int difference = minSize(set1) - maxSize(set2);
        return difference >= 0 ? difference : max(minSize(set2) - maxSize(set1), 0);
      }

      @Override
      int maxSize() {
        return saturatedAdd(maxSize(set1), maxSize(set2));
      }

                int expectedSize = copy.size();
                int actualEncoded = copy.encode(buffer, 0);

                // Then
                assertEquals(expectedSize, actualEncoded, "Size and encode methods return different values for " + numChunks + " chunks");
            }
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle large number of chunks")
        void testLargeNumberOfChunks() {
            // Given

        // Test equality with same password
        assertEquals(auth1, auth2);
        assertEquals(auth1.hashCode(), auth2.hashCode());

        // Test inequality with different password
        assertNotEquals(auth1, auth3);

        // Test after password wipe
        auth1.secureWipePassword();
        assertNotEquals(auth1, auth2);
    }

    /**

        case MEMORY:
            return "Reduce buffer sizes or increase heap memory";
        case DISK_SPACE:
            return "Free up disk space or use a different location";
        case QUOTA:
            return "Contact administrator to increase quota limits";
        case LOCK:
            return "Release existing locks or wait for them to be released";
        case BUFFER:

   *     deserialized
   * @throws AssertionFailedError if the re-serialized object is not equal to the original object,
   *     or if the hashcodes are different.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public static <T> T reserializeAndAssert(T object) {
    T copy = reserialize(object);
    new EqualsTester().addEqualityGroup(object, copy).testEquals();

/**
 * Tests that all package-private {@code writeReplace} methods are overridden in any existing
 * subclasses. Without such overrides, optimizers might put a {@code writeReplace}-containing class
 * and its subclass in different packages, causing the serialization system to fail to invoke {@code
 * writeReplace} when serializing an instance of the subclass. For an example of this problem, see
 * b/310253115.
 */
@NullUnmarked

I'll tell you a bit more about these **concepts** here, and that would hopefully give you the **intuition** you would need to decide how to deploy your API in very different environments, possibly even in **future** ones that don't exist yet.

By considering these concepts, you will be able to **evaluate and design** the best way to deploy **your own APIs**.

        int actualInfoLevel = SMBUtil.readInt2(buffer, 0);
        assertEquals(0x0103, actualInfoLevel);
    }

    @DisplayName("Test writeParametersWireFormat with different information levels")
    @ParameterizedTest
    @CsvSource({ "-1, 1", // SMB_INFO_ALLOCATION -> 0x0001
            "3, 259" // FS_SIZE_INFO -> 0x0103
    })

            assertTrue(utf16Bytes.length > 0, "UTF-16LE bytes should not be empty");
            assertNotEquals(utf8Bytes.length, utf16Bytes.length, "Different encodings should produce different lengths");
        }

        @ParameterizedTest
        @DisplayName("getBytes should handle various string inputs")
        @NullAndEmptySource

            System.arraycopy(name.getBytes("US-ASCII"), 0, src, srcIndex + 1 + (i * 18), 16);
            src[srcIndex + 1 + (i * 18) + 15] = (byte) i; // Different hex codes
            src[srcIndex + 1 + (i * 18) + 16] = 0x04; // Active flag
        }

        // MAC address
        int macOffset = srcIndex + 1 + (18 * numNames);