assertNotNull(thumbnailJob.sessionId);
        assertTrue(result.contains("Session Id:"));

        // The test cannot actually start the process since it requires many dependencies
        // The execute method catches the exception and returns the session ID
    }

    // Test execute with custom session ID
    @Test
    public void test_execute_withCustomSessionId() {
        thumbnailJob.sessionId = "custom-session-456";

        }
    }

    @Test
    public void test_constant_WEB_API_EXCEPTION() {
        // Test that the constant WEB_API_EXCEPTION is used correctly
        // This is verified by checking the behavior matches expected constant usage

        // Since the constant is private, we can't access it directly
        // But we can verify the behavior is consistent
        try {
            WebApiUtil.setError(400, "Test error");

* Remove flannel because now everything here is upstreamed ([#33860](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/33860), [@luxas](https://github.com/luxas))
* Use patched golang1.7.1 for cross-builds targeting darwin ([#33803](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/33803), [@ixdy](https://github.com/ixdy))

     * @return True if the status code indicates a redirect, false otherwise
     */
    protected boolean isRedirectHttpStatus(final int httpStatusCode) {
        return redirectHttpStatusPattern.matcher(Integer.toString(httpStatusCode)).matches();
    }

    /**
     * Executes the HTTP client request.
     *
     * @param httpRequest The HTTP request to execute
     * @return The HTTP response

		if err != nil {
			t.Fatalf("Test %d: %s: Failed parsing response body: <ERROR> %v", i+1, instanceType, err)
		}

		if recV4.Code != testCase.expectedRespStatus {
			// Verify whether the bucket policy fetched is same as the one inserted.
			var expectedPolicy *policy.BucketPolicy
			expectedPolicy, err = policy.ParseBucketPolicyConfig(strings.NewReader(expectedBucketPolicyStr), testCase.bucketName)
			if err != nil {

 - The flag `--experimental-patches` is now deprecated and will be removed in a future release. You can migrate to using the new flag `--patches`. Add a new field `{Init|Join}Configuration.patches.directory` that can be used for the same purpose. For `init` and `join` it is now recommended that you migrate to configure patches via `{Init|Join}Configuration.patches.directory`. For the time being, these flags can be mixed with `--config`, but that...

    assertThat(futureResult.toString())
        .matches(
            "CombinedFuture@\\w+\\[status=PENDING,"
                + " info=\\[futures=\\[SettableFuture@\\w+\\[status=PENDING],"
                + " SettableFuture@\\w+\\[status=PENDING]]]]");
    Integer integerPartial = 1;
    futureInteger.set(integerPartial);
    assertThat(futureResult.toString())
        .matches(
            "CombinedFuture@\\w+\\[status=PENDING,"

    assertThat(futureResult.toString())
        .matches(
            "CombinedFuture@\\w+\\[status=PENDING,"
                + " info=\\[futures=\\[SettableFuture@\\w+\\[status=PENDING],"
                + " SettableFuture@\\w+\\[status=PENDING]]]]");
    Integer integerPartial = 1;
    futureInteger.set(integerPartial);
    assertThat(futureResult.toString())
        .matches(
            "CombinedFuture@\\w+\\[status=PENDING,"

    // ternaries introduce their own problems. because of the ternary (which requires a boxing
    // operation) no overload can be selected in phase 1.  and in phase 2 it is ambiguous since it
    // matches with the second parameter being boxed and without it being boxed.  The cast to Object
    // avoids this.
    checkState(aBoolean, "", aBoolean ? "" : anInt, (Object) anInt);

    // ternaries introduce their own problems. because of the ternary (which requires a boxing
    // operation) no overload can be selected in phase 1.  and in phase 2 it is ambiguous since it
    // matches with the second parameter being boxed and without it being boxed.  The cast to Object
    // avoids this.
    checkState(aBoolean, "", aBoolean ? "" : anInt, (Object) anInt);