in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.

---

„_Ehrlich, was Du gebaut hast, sieht super solide und poliert aus. In vielerlei Hinsicht ist es so, wie ich **Hug** haben wollte – es ist wirklich inspirierend, jemanden so etwas bauen zu sehen._“

			CollectedAt: UTCNow(),
		}
		cm, err := c.Times(false)
		if err != nil {
			m.Errors = append(m.Errors, fmt.Sprintf("%s: %v (cpuTimes)", byHostName, err.Error()))
		} else {
			// not collecting per-cpu stats, so there will be only one element
			if len(cm) == 1 {
				m.Aggregated.CPU.TimesStat = &cm[0]
			} else {
				m.Errors = append(m.Errors, fmt.Sprintf("%s: Expected one CPU stat, got %d", byHostName, len(cm)))
			}
		}

       actually changes the test classpath itself. This means that it
       can"t benefit from incremental build acceleration, because on every
       execution it sees that the classpath has changed, and so to be
       safe, it needs to re-run.

       - This is unfortunate, because actually it would be safe to declare
       the task as up-to-date, because these two files, which are based on

import org.junit.rules.TestRule
import org.junit.runner.Description
import org.junit.runners.model.Statement

/**
 * A log handler that records which log messages were published so that a calling test can make
 * assertions about them.
 */
class TestLogHandler(
  private val logger: Logger,
) : TestRule,
  BeforeEachCallback,
  AfterEachCallback {

import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/** Methods factored out so that they can be emulated differently in GWT. */
@GwtCompatible
final class TestPlatform {
  static void verifyGetOnPendingFuture(Future<?> future) {
    checkNotNull(future);
    try {

            // that would happen here should cause the build to fail at a later stage
            // (when actually parsing the POM) and will lead to a better exception being
            // displayed to the user, so just bail out and return false.
        }
        return false;
    }

     * can take 1-10 seconds to find colliding objects. Mocking frameworks that
     * can do magic to mock static method calls still can't do so for a system
     * class, so we need the indirection. In production, Hotspot should still
     * recognize that the call is 1-morphic and should still be willing to
     * inline it if necessary.
     */

        TransWaitNamedPipeResponse response2 = new TransWaitNamedPipeResponse(mockConfig);

        // Act & Assert
        assertNotSame(response1, response2);
        // Both instances have the same initial state, so toString() will be the same
        // This is expected behavior since they're created with the same configuration
        assertEquals(response1.toString(), response2.toString());
    }

    @Test