void testWriteSetupWireFormatWithVariousFids(int fid, byte expectedLow, byte expectedHigh) {
        // Arrange
        transPeekNamedPipe = new TransPeekNamedPipe(mockConfig, TEST_PIPE_NAME, fid);
        byte[] buffer = new byte[10];
        int offset = 0;

        // Act
        int bytesWritten = transPeekNamedPipe.writeSetupWireFormat(buffer, offset);

        // Assert

    int keyCount = stream.readInt();
    if (keyCount < 0) {
      throw new InvalidObjectException("Invalid key count " + keyCount);
    }
    ImmutableMap.Builder<Object, ImmutableSet<Object>> builder = ImmutableMap.builder();
    int tmpSize = 0;

    for (int i = 0; i < keyCount; i++) {
      Object key = requireNonNull(stream.readObject());
      int valueCount = stream.readInt();

	SHA256MSG2 (BX), X11     // 440f38cd1b
	SHA256MSG2 (R11), X11    // 450f38cd1b
	SHA256MSG2 X2, X11       // 440f38cdda
	SHA256MSG2 X11, X11      // 450f38cddb
	// Test VPERMQ with both uint8 and int8 immediate args
	VPERMQ $-40, Y8, Y8 // c443fd00c0d8
	VPERMQ $216, Y8, Y8 // c443fd00c0d8
	// Test that VPERMPD that shares ytab list with VPERMQ continues to work too.
	VPERMPD $-40, Y7, Y7 // c4e3fd01ffd8

   * multimap, save that if all values associated with a key are removed and then the key is added
   * back into the multimap, that key will come last in the key iteration order.
   */
  public static MultimapBuilderWithKeys<@Nullable Object> linkedHashKeys(int expectedKeys) {
    checkNonnegative(expectedKeys, "expectedKeys");
    return new MultimapBuilderWithKeys<@Nullable Object>() {
      @Override

   * multimap, save that if all values associated with a key are removed and then the key is added
   * back into the multimap, that key will come last in the key iteration order.
   */
  public static MultimapBuilderWithKeys<@Nullable Object> linkedHashKeys(int expectedKeys) {
    checkNonnegative(expectedKeys, "expectedKeys");
    return new MultimapBuilderWithKeys<@Nullable Object>() {
      @Override

<code>g</code> pointer into.
</p>

<p>
For example, the sequence to load <code>g</code> and <code>m</code>
using <code>CX</code> looks like this:
</p>

<pre>
#include "go_tls.h"
#include "go_asm.h"
...
get_tls(CX)
MOVL	g(CX), AX     // Move g into AX.
MOVL	g_m(AX), BX   // Move g.m into BX.
</pre>

<p>

  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_nonNegative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 16;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isAtLeast(0);

            // Given
            byte[] dst = new byte[100];
            int dstIndex = 0;

            // When
            int result = response.writeBytesWireFormat(dst, dstIndex);

            // Then
            assertEquals(0, result);
        }

        @ParameterizedTest
        @ValueSource(ints = { 0, 10, 50, 99 })
        @DisplayName("Should return 0 regardless of destination index")

        byte[] buffer = new byte[256];
        int result = request.readBytesWireFormat(buffer, 0);

        assertEquals(0, result);
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @ValueSource(ints = { 0, 10, 50, 100 })
    @DisplayName("writeBytesWireFormat should work at different offsets")
    void testWriteBytesWireFormatAtDifferentOffsets(int offset) {
        byte[] buffer = new byte[512];

    }
  }

  public void testCrc32cStrideTable() {
    int next = CRC32C_GENERATOR_FLIPPED;
    for (int i = 0; i < 12; i++) { // for 3 ints = 12 bytes in between each stride window
      next = (next >>> 8) ^ Crc32cHashFunction.Crc32cHasher.byteTable[next & 0xFF];
    }
    int[][] expected = new int[4][256];
    for (int b = 0; b < 4; ++b) {
      for (int bit = 128; bit != 0; bit >>= 1) {
        expected[b][bit] = next;