AfterEnqueuedTasks,

    /** Resumes after all other tasks, including tasks enqueued while yielding. */
    AfterOtherTasks,
  }

  /** Returns the task that was started, or null if there were no tasks to start. */
  private fun startNextTask(): SerialTask? {
    taskRunner.assertLockHeld()

    val index = serialTaskQueue.indexOfFirst { it.isReady() }
    if (index == -1) return null

ENV BAZEL_VC "C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Community\VC"

# Environment variables to work around MSYS issues.
ENV MSYS_NO_PATHCONV 1
ENV MSYS2_ARG_CONV_EXCL *

# This should only be necessary if there are multiple, differently-versioned
# MSVC compilers installed, and a particular one should be used.
# To find exact versions available:
# - Navigate to the relevant folder, e.g.

    checkHelperVersion(NO_ATOMIC_REFERENCE_FIELD_UPDATER, "SynchronizedHelper");

    // Then, run the actual tests under each alternative classloader:

    /*
     * Under Java 8, there is no need to test the no-VarHandle case here: It's already tested by the
     * main AbstractFutureTest, which uses the default AtomicHelper, which we verified above to be
     * UnsafeAtomicHelper.
     */
    if (!isJava8()) {

         * The total number of pages in the search results.
         */
        protected int pageCount;
        /**
         * Indicates if there is a next page of search results.
         */
        protected boolean nextPage;
        /**
         * Indicates if there is a previous page of search results.
         */
        protected boolean prevPage;
        /**

`X-Minio-Replication-DeleteMarker-Status` header on `HEAD/GET` calls for the delete marker version in question - i.e with `mc stat --version-id dm-version-id`

It must be noted that if active-active replication is set up with delete marker replication, there is potential for duplicate delete markers to be created if both source and target concurrently set a Delete Marker or if one/both of the clusters went down at tandem before the replication event was synced.This is an unavoidable side-effect in active-active...

   *
   * @since 7.0
   */
  // The signature we really want here is...
  //
  // <T extends @Nullable Object> @JointlyNullable T find(
  //     Iterable<? extends T> iterable,
  //     Predicate<? super T> predicate,
  //     @JointlyNullable T defaultValue);
  //
  // ...where "@JointlyNullable" is similar to @PolyNull but slightly different:
  //

/// note

Keep in mind that you have to return the `JSONResponse` directly.

///

/// info

The `model` key is not part of OpenAPI.

**FastAPI** will take the Pydantic model from there, generate the JSON Schema, and put it in the correct place.

The correct place is:

* In the key `content`, that has as value another JSON object (`dict`) that contains:

            StackOverflowError.class,
            e -> e instanceof StackOverflowError);
      }
    };

    // used under GWT, etc., since the override of this method does not exist there
    ImmutableMap<Class<? extends Throwable>, Predicate<Throwable>> exceptions() {
      return ImmutableMap.of();
    }
  }

            StackOverflowError.class,
            e -> e instanceof StackOverflowError);
      }
    };

    // used under GWT, etc., since the override of this method does not exist there
    ImmutableMap<Class<? extends Throwable>, Predicate<Throwable>> exceptions() {
      return ImmutableMap.of();
    }
  }

            StackOverflowError.class,
            e -> e instanceof StackOverflowError);
      }
    };

    // used under GWT, etc., since the override of this method does not exist there
    ImmutableMap<Class<? extends Throwable>, Predicate<Throwable>> exceptions() {
      return ImmutableMap.of();
    }
  }