}
    }
    
    private boolean isAuthorizedWitnessServer(InetAddress server) {
        // Implementation would check against authorized server list
        // Could use certificates, Kerberos, etc.
        return true;  // Simplified
    }
    
    private boolean isValidNotificationSource(WitnessNotification notification) {

            }
        });

        // Thread 2: Continuously reads trees
        executor.submit(() -> {
            try {
                for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
                    // This would cause ConcurrentModificationException with ArrayList
                    session.getSmbTree("readshare", null);
                    successCount.incrementAndGet();
                }
            } catch (Exception e) {

   *
   * <p>For example, if {@code rangeMap} had the entries {@code [1, 5] => "foo", (6, 8) => "bar",
   * (10, ∞) => "baz"} then {@code rangeMap.subRangeMap(Range.open(3, 12))} would return a range map
   * with the entries {@code (3, 5] => "foo", (6, 8) => "bar", (10, 12) => "baz"}.
   *
   * <p>The returned range map supports all optional operations that this range map supports, except

   */
  public static List<String> readLines(URL url, Charset charset) throws IOException {
    // don't use asCharSource(url, charset).readLines() because that returns
    // an immutable list, which would change the behavior of this method
    return readLines(
        url,
        charset,
        new LineProcessor<List<String>>() {
          final List<String> result = new ArrayList<>();

          @Override

      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we
      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.
      throw new TimeoutException("Timed out waiting for " + this + " to reach the RUNNING state.");
    }
  }

 * the public API of {@code UniAddress} and its behaviour when provided
 * with different kinds of inputs.  Many static helpers in {@code
 * UniAddress} are network dependent and therefore not exercised here – they
 * would require complex stubbing of static methods.  Instead the tests
 * concentrate on the instance methods and simple static predicates
 * that are observable without network access.
 */
@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)

  //
  // ...where "@JointlyNullable" is similar to @PolyNull but slightly different:
  //
  // - @PolyNull means "@Nullable or @Nonnull"
  //   (That would be unsound for an input Iterable<@Nullable Foo>. So, if we wanted to use
  //   @PolyNull, we would have to restrict this method to non-null <T>. But it has users who pass
  //   iterables with null elements.)
  //
  // - @JointlyNullable means "@Nullable or no annotation"

 * instance should be created every time the method is called.
 *
 * <p>For example, the subclass could pass a {@link java.util.TreeMap} during construction, and
 * {@link #createCollection()} could return a {@link java.util.TreeSet}, in which case the
 * multimap's iterators would propagate through the keys and values in sorted order.
 *

package gorm

import (
	"fmt"
	"regexp"
	"strings"

	"gorm.io/gorm/clause"
	"gorm.io/gorm/utils"
)

// Model specify the model you would like to run db operations
//
//	// update all users's name to `hello`
//	db.Model(&User{}).Update("name", "hello")
//	// if user's primary key is non-blank, will use it as condition, then will only update that user's name to `hello`
//	db.Model(&user).Update("name", "hello")

        if (entry != null) {
          Object canonical = entry.getKey();
          if (canonical != null) { // only matters if weak/soft keys are used
            // The compiler would know this is safe if not for our use of raw types (see above).
            @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
            E result = (E) canonical;
            return result;
          }
        }