import com.google.common.util.concurrent.UncheckedExecutionException;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * {@link LoadingCache} tests for caches with a maximum size of zero.
 *
 * @author mike nonemacher
 */
public class NullCacheTest extends TestCase {
  QueuingRemovalListener<Object, Object> listener;

  @Override
  protected void setUp() {
    listener = queuingRemovalListener();
  }

 * implement {@link Serializable}, a serializable subclass may be created since this class has a
 * parameter-less constructor.
 *
 * @author Mike Bostock
 * @since 2.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public abstract class ForwardingObject {

  /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
  protected ForwardingObject() {}

  /**

    try {
      long remainingNanos = unit.toNanos(timeout);
      long end = System.nanoTime() + remainingNanos;

      while (true) {
        try {
          // TimeUnit.timedJoin() treats negative timeouts just like zero.
          NANOSECONDS.timedJoin(thread, remainingNanos);
          return;
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
          interrupted = true;
          remainingNanos = end - System.nanoTime();
        }

import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.OutputStream;
import java.io.Writer;
import java.util.Map;

import org.apache.maven.settings.Settings;

/**
 * Handles serialization of settings into some kind of textual format like XML.
 *
 * @deprecated since 4.0.0, use {@link org.apache.maven.api.services.xml.SettingsXmlFactory} instead
 */
@Deprecated(since = "4.0.0")
public interface SettingsWriter {

    /**

    validations:
      required: true

  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this enhancement in a real-world scenario, or does
        it just seem like a sensible behavior for the feature to have?


        Before we make significant changes to existing features in Guava, we really want to be sure

 * dashboard to create a client ID and secret for this application.
 *
 * <p>You must configure your Slack API OAuth and Permissions page with a localhost URL like {@code
 * http://localhost:53203/oauth/}, passing the same port to this class’ constructor.
 */
public final class SlackApi {
  private final HttpUrl baseUrl = HttpUrl.get("https://slack.com/api/");

type MutatingWebhookConfigInfo struct {
	Name     string `json:"name"`
	Revision string `json:"revision"`
	Tag      string `json:"tag,omitempty"`
}

// NsInfo represents namespace related information like pods running there.
// It is used to display data and is exposed for integration tests.
type NsInfo struct {
	Name string             `json:"name,omitempty"`
	Pods []*PodFilteredInfo `json:"pods,omitempty"`
}

endif
# The old docker issue manifests as not being able to run *any* binary. So we can test
# by trying to run a trivial program and ensuring it actually ran. If not, emit our warning.
# Note: we cannot do anything like $(shell docker version) to check, since that would also fail.
CAN_RUN := $(shell echo "can I run echo")
ifeq ($(CAN_RUN),)
$(error $(warning))
endif

    expectUnchanged();
    assertTrue(collection.contains(e0()));
  }

  /*
   * AbstractCollection fails the removeAll(null) test when the subject
   * collection is empty, but we'd still like to test removeAll(null) when we
   * can. We split the test into empty and non-empty cases. This allows us to
   * suppress only the former.
   */

  @CollectionFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE)

    suite.addTest(
        MapTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new TestTypeToInstanceMapGenerator() {
                  // Other tests will verify what real, warning-free usage looks like
                  // but here we have to do some serious fudging
                  @Override
                  @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"})