package tests_test

import (
	"testing"
	"time"

	"gorm.io/gorm"
	. "gorm.io/gorm/utils/tests"
)

func TestCustomizeColumn(t *testing.T) {
	type CustomizeColumn struct {
		ID   int64      `gorm:"column:mapped_id; primary_key:yes"`
		Name string     `gorm:"column:mapped_name"`
		Date *time.Time `gorm:"column:mapped_time"`
	}

	DB.Migrator().DropTable(&CustomizeColumn{})
	DB.AutoMigrate(&CustomizeColumn{})

package jcifs.smb1.smb1;

import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue;

import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;

/**
 * Unit tests for the Trans2FindNext2 class.
 */
class Trans2FindNext2Test {

    /**
     * Verifies constructor initializes protocol fields and limits correctly.
     */
    @Test
    void testConstructorInitializesFields() {
        // Given

#### A "professional" attack { #a-professional-attack }

Of course, the attackers would not try all this by hand, they would write a program to do it, possibly with thousands or millions of tests per second. And they would get just one extra correct letter at a time.

* D'obtenir de nombreuses fonctionnalités supplémentaires (grâce à  Starlette) comme :
    * **WebSockets**
    * de tester le code très facilement avec `requests` et `pytest`
    * **<abbr title="Cross-Origin Resource Sharing">CORS</abbr>**
    * **Cookie Sessions**
    * ... et plus encore.

## Performance

import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean;

import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.DisplayName;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Timeout;

/**
 * Unit tests for ResourceManager
 */
public class ResourceManagerTest {

    private ResourceManager resourceManager;

    @BeforeEach
    void setUp() {
        resourceManager = ResourceManager.getInstance();

import org.mockito.ArgumentCaptor;
import org.mockito.InOrder;
import org.mockito.Mock;
import org.mockito.junit.jupiter.MockitoExtension;

import jcifs.CIFSException;
import jcifs.SmbSession;

/**
 * Tests for SmbTreeHandleInternal interface using Mockito to verify
 * interactions and observable behavior of collaborators.
 */
@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
public class SmbTreeHandleInternalTest {

    @Mock

import kotlin.test.Test
import kotlin.test.assertEquals
import kotlin.test.assertNull
import okhttp3.MediaType.Companion.toMediaTypeOrNull

/**
 * Test MediaType API and parsing.
 *
 * This test includes tests from [Guava's](https://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/)
 * MediaTypeTest.
 */
open class MediaTypeTest {
  open fun MediaType.charsetName(): String? = parameter("charset")?.uppercase()

 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
@NullMarked
public abstract class AbstractMapTester<K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
    extends AbstractContainerTester<Map<K, V>, Entry<K, V>> {

/// tip | Порада

Якщо Вам потрібно викликати `async`-функції у ваших тестах, окрім відправлення запитів до FastAPI-застосунку (наприклад, асинхронні функції роботи з базою даних), перегляньте [Асинхронні тести](../advanced/async-tests.md){.internal-link target=_blank} у розширеному керівництві.

///

## Розділення тестів

У реальному застосунку Ваші тести, ймовірно, будуть в окремому файлі.

Ele também inclui o que mudou, como as validações agora são mais corretas e rigorosas, possíveis ressalvas, etc.

Você pode lê-lo para entender melhor o que mudou.

## Testes { #tests }

Garanta que você tenha [testes](../tutorial/testing.md){.internal-link target=_blank} para sua aplicação e que os execute na integração contínua (CI).