assertNotNull(buffer1, "First buffer should not be null");
        assertNotNull(buffer2, "Second buffer should not be null");
        assertEquals(1024, buffer1.length, "Buffer should have expected size");
        assertEquals(1024, buffer2.length, "Buffer should have expected size");
        assertNotSame(buffer1, buffer2, "Different calls should return different buffers initially");
    }

    @Test

import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNotNull;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNull;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.mock;

import java.util.Date;

import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import org.mockito.Mock;

/**
 * Unit tests for the {@link Info} implementations used by the SMB1
 * protocol handling code.
 */

 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind
 *   <li>or the usual, <i>robust</i> behavior, which all known {@link Collection} implementations
 *       have, of returning a new, independent iterator
 * </ul>
 *

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 * {@link #callAndAssertBlocks} method is ever called in a test, the lock-like object must have a
 * method equivalent to {@link java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock#hasQueuedThread(Thread)}. If
 * the {@link #callAndAssertWaits} method is ever called in a test, the lock-like object must have a
 * method equivalent to {@link
 * java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock#hasWaiters(java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition)},

        }

        // All nonces should be unique (high entropy from SecureRandom)
        assertEquals(sampleSize, uniqueCounters.size(), "All nonces should have unique values");

        // Verify that nonces have good entropy (not predictable)
        // With SecureRandom + counter XOR, they should all be different
        Set<String> uniqueNonces = new HashSet<>();
        for (byte[] nonce : nonces) {

   * following constraints. This is the callers responsibility and is not enforced here.
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>Both {@code xStats} and {@code yStats} must have the same {@code count}.
   *   <li>If that {@code count} is 1, {@code sumOfProductsOfDeltas} must be exactly 0.0.
   *   <li>If that {@code count} is more than 1, {@code sumOfProductsOfDeltas} must be finite.
   * </ul>
   */