* {@code initialCapacity} values without resizing. The returned builder is not thread-safe.
   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> When feasible, {@code initialCapacity} should be the exact number
   * of values that will be added, if that knowledge is readily available. It is better to guess a
   * value slightly too high than slightly too low. If the value is not exact, the {@link

      // one execute() call to another instance from the same ExecutionSequencer, we know by
      // induction that the task that launched this one must not have added any other runnables to
      // that thread's queue, and thus we cannot be replacing a TaskAndThread object that would
      // otherwise have another task queued on to it. Note the exception to this, cancellation, is

   * computation is already complete, immediately.
   *
   * <p>The callback is run on {@code executor}. There is no guaranteed ordering of execution of
   * callbacks, but any callback added through this method is guaranteed to be called once the
   * computation is complete.
   *
   * <p>Example:
   *
   * <pre>{@code
   * future.addCallback(
   *     new FutureCallback<QueryResult>() {

```
mc admin bucket remote add myminio/srcbucket https://accessKey:secretKey@replica-endpoint:9000/destbucket --service replication --region us-east-1

  `comp:` etc.  At this stage we check if the PR is valid and meets certain
  quality requirements. For example, we check if the CLA is signed, PR has
  sufficient description, if applicable unit tests are added, if it is a
  reasonable contribution (meaning it is not a single liner cosmetic PR).

**2. Valid?**

-   If the PR passes all the quality checks then we go ahead and assign a
    reviewer.

   * Builder} constructor.
   */
  public static <K, V> Builder<K, V> builder() {
    return new Builder<>();
  }

  /**
   * Returns a new builder with a hint for how many distinct keys are expected to be added. The
   * generated builder is equivalent to that returned by {@link #builder}, but may perform better if
   * {@code expectedKeys} is a good estimate.
   *

    // notifications for all of them.
    for (int i = 0; i < nSeededEntries; i++) {
      assertEquals("b" + i, removalNotifications.get("b" + i));
    }

    // Each of the values added to the map should either still be there, or have seen a removal
    // notification.
    assertEquals(expectedKeys, Sets.union(cache.asMap().keySet(), removalNotifications.keySet()));

  fun evictAll() {
    cache.evictAll()
  }

  /**
   * Returns an iterator over the URLs in this cache. This iterator doesn't throw
   * `ConcurrentModificationException`, but if new responses are added while iterating, their URLs
   * will not be returned. If existing responses are evicted during iteration, they will be absent
   * (unless they were already returned).
   *

    }

    /**
     * The number of permutations with repeated elements is calculated as follows:
     *
     * <ul>
     *   <li>For an empty list, it is 1 (base case).
     *   <li>When r numbers are added to a list of n-r elements, the number of permutations is
     *       increased by a factor of (n choose r).
     * </ul>
     */
    private static <E> int calculateSize(

            return null;
        } else if (Artifact.SCOPE_COMPILE.equals(scope) && Artifact.SCOPE_COMPILE.equals(inheritedScope)) {
            // added to retain compile artifactScope. Remove if you want compile inherited as runtime
            desiredScope = Artifact.SCOPE_COMPILE;
        }

        if (Artifact.SCOPE_TEST.equals(inheritedScope)) {